The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Gunns: getting the facts straight ... > Comments

Gunns: getting the facts straight ... : Comments

By Alan Ashbarry, published 14/9/2007

'Click and send' campaigns encourage ill-informed comment when it comes to the proposed Gunn's pulp mill in Tasmania.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. Page 9
  10. All
These alarmist statements about the fate of the treated effluent are based upon a submission by a Dr Godfrey on behalf of the surfriders.org. The Chief scientist expert panel interviewed Dr Godfrey and a reviewer of his report from consultant BMT WBM. These statements are based on Dr Godfrey’s interpretation of a photo of Nye Beach Oregon, USA that is claimed to show pollution from a pulp mill. See http://www.tca.org.au/Home%20Page%20Documents/Effluent_Dispersal_and_Content.pdf

However there appears to be no attempt by the consultant to verify the accuracy of this photo montage, yet Dr Godfrey’s conclusions and theories have been accepted.

The expert panel’s statement appears to ignore the results of the investigation by the Oregon Department of Environment Quality into the claims based on this photo that ribbons of polluted water will hit the beach.

The DEQ investigation including dye testing and modelling showed that the potential mechanism put forward by Dr Godfrey was in fact not possible.

The Newport Media reported this investigation as:

“DEQ officials said they had no evidence the discharge endangers human health or marine life, and determined that while winds might push the effluent toward shore, "the dilution will be so great that pollutants will be well below water quality criteria prior to reaching the surf zone.“ DEQ found no risk to people swimming at Nye Beach.”

Dr Godfrey failed to state in his report that there was also a sewerage outfall located at the beach.

If the expert panel was aware of these reports (for further details check Oregon Department of Environmental Quality is available from http://www.deq.state.or.us/wr/LocalProjects/GPToledo/WQeval.pdf) they should have rejected these claims and there would be no need for the public to be alarmed
Posted by cinders, Saturday, 13 October 2007 9:39:18 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. Page 9
  10. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy