The Forum > Article Comments > Food, water and oil - the hidden link > Comments
Food, water and oil - the hidden link : Comments
By Colin Chartres, published 1/8/2007Increased populations, water and food shortages and peak oil combined will present society with a huge challenge.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
-
- All
Posted by Aime, Wednesday, 1 August 2007 1:05:27 PM
| |
not true, aime- we can have the power, but first need the will.
listening to you outline so many things wrong with pollie rule, and then just shrugging your shoulders and crying "nothing to be done" is very depressing. like almost every ozzie i've talked to, your spine was dissolved by school and media. or maybe it's genetic- brits have been tugging their forelocks to survive for 900 years. i've been inviting ozzies to get up on their hind hooves since 1972. there has been some progress. but lately the forces for authoritarian rule have discovered there is no one to stop them here. so it's by no means clear which way we're going. my best guess is 2084 will be much like '1984'. Posted by DEMOS, Wednesday, 1 August 2007 1:33:40 PM
| |
Hi Colin
Increased population is nothing new as far as the human race is concerned. We see it increasing as people do what the animals and plants cannot do and employ their creative powers (Prometheus anyone?) to make discoveries and employ the fruits of these discoveries for the benefit of all. There does exist in human history and culture an oligarchic counter current that seeks to limit this kind of progress by instituting a zero sum game whereby the few seek power for its own sake and sentence the rest to live as cattle. So my question to you is- Do you believe that the employment of new technologies such as desalination is out of the question as regards increasing the supply of fresh water available? Do you discount any scientific advances in desalination as regards to the solving of this problem and have you taken advanced nuclear/fusion power off the agenda when deciding this? (Why, hello again Prometheus!) Are you aware of any forces that intend we all get a water ration (issued by guess who?)as well as a carbon trading credit? Posted by Jellyback, Wednesday, 1 August 2007 2:02:44 PM
| |
To me, on the face of it, the increased CO2 and precipitation associated with global warming would seem to be good news for food crop production.
But of course global warming, by definition, cannot have any beneficial effects. In fact any change to the atmospheric concentrations of CO2 or temperature, up or down must have catastrophic consequences - the conditions prevailing in 1900 were just right - wait a minute that was the middle of the Federation Drought which, by the way, bore a remarkable resemblance to the most recent drought. http://www.bom.gov.au/lam/climate/levelthree/c20thc/drought1.htm If only the $US50 billion so far spent on global warming/climate change research had been spent on genuinely improving the living conditions of most of the world's burgeoning population - a problem that can be solved, but only by rapid economic development. Posted by Admiral von Schneider, Wednesday, 1 August 2007 6:39:23 PM
| |
It is a major problem that governments are withdrawing from research and development projects but what is worse is that corporate sector has been incentivised into taking over the "public" plant breeding. Of course they will want very good return on their investment so cost will be far higher and because the average consumer wants cheap food, the incentive to develop non-food crops will win over. Food crops will be replaced by pharmaceutical and industrial crops which will further deplete the food supply. Of course farmers wanting to grow food crops will not be able to do so as consumers will not accept contamination of pharmaceutical and industrial crops. If crops are introduced under the current negligent rules where the food crop growers must keep contaminates out rather than the contaminator being responsible for containing their product, farmers may lose the ability to market a food crop.
Legislation needs to look beyond simply selling the public out for a quick buck for the government. Posted by Non-GM farmer, Wednesday, 1 August 2007 7:07:50 PM
| |
$50 billion on climate change research? Do you have a breakdown of that Admiral? Is it USD or AUD? Your military background might give you some insight into the monthly expenditure on the War on Terror. That would be about 50 billion USD a month wouldn't it? How far could those funds go toward developing renewable energy sources and alleviating the world's many problems? Not nearly as much as a few tank battalions and several thousand rounds of depleted uranium perhaps?
Posted by Fester, Wednesday, 1 August 2007 7:17:16 PM
|
Governments are in business for only one reason, to Govern those people under their electorate (I'm talking democratic Governments of course) and they do this most effectively by stealing our money through taxes, then handing it to large corporations who in turn use some of that money to make sure the political thieves of their choice retain power over the tax payers.
Our Governments know full well that to make more money to hand to big business, you need an ever increasing fund base. This is done in two ways. 1, by printing "fiat" money and 2 by increasing the population which in turn has to buy that same fiat money by providing their labor, intelligence or both combined. In other words, Governments are hell bent on "creating" as many tax payers as they can with absolute disregard for the environment, water etc. The sad part is that eventually, those Governments will take water rights away from citizens who have provided for the future by installing tanks, dams and recycling systems.
Colin, I wish you well in your endeavors, but you're facing a gigantic juggernaut of Worldwide Governments who know only one way of doing business and that's by using the planet as a giant quarry. Only nature has the power to stop the madness.