The Forum > Article Comments > What do AWAs really pay? > Comments
What do AWAs really pay? : Comments
By David Peetz and Alison Preston, published 20/7/2007Research indicates that AWAs are frequently used for cost cutting or union avoidance.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
-
- All
Johnj wrote: “Public holidays, RDOs, penalty rates, rest breaks, annual leave etc etc can be be removed under AWAs. I'd want a damn sight more than 15% to compensate, but perhaps your choice might be different” Let’s do the math. Working days excluding public holidays = 365 days * 5/7 = 261. 16% (not 15%) of 261 = 41days. Remove 20 days annual leave = 21 days. RDOs are a flexible working arrangement so are irrelevant in the calculation. Your suggesting people sign away rest breaks in their AWAs is pandering union propaganda. Thus we have around 21 days of extra pay just for removing penalty rates and public holidays which may be attractive to a lot of workers i.e. Work “Choices”.
Rache wrote: “Everybody else on an AWA with me has identical conditions and we are all getting less than those on Award conditions for doing the same work.” I see numerous claims like these on various blogs so please forgive my scepticism. It is interesting that the WorkChoices web site states: “Although terms in awards about annual leave, personal/carer’s leave and parental leave are preserved, an employee’s entitlements will generally be determined by the Australian Fair Pay and Conditions Standard (the Standard). When a preserved award term is more generous to an employee than the Standard, the more generous award entitlement will apply. Otherwise the Standard applies.” Now let’s look at another example that occurred to me when employed in telecommunications in the late 80s under a Labour federal govt. I was forced to join the ETU before I could enter construction sites in the CBD and in a 3 month period I had to go on strike several times without being told why. The outcome? I was getting much less than the award.