The Forum > Article Comments > Mifepristone: not a panacea > Comments
Mifepristone: not a panacea : Comments
By Helen Ransom, published 2/11/2005Helen Ransom argues the abortion drug endangers the lives of women.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Page 19
-
- All
in Madame Tussauds, doesent mean its a human. At week 12 there is
no functioning and developed brain, just lots of dividing cells.
Its not a person, end of story.
You have no idea why a man leaves, or a woman leaves a marriage.
Lots of things can come into play. Some people are better court
actors then others, etc. Why are you tying up money with blame?
They are separate issues. Marriage is not a business and it should not be. The fact that no more private investigators are hired and
no more dirt upon dirt is aired in court, is a positive thing IMHO.
My dismissal of Fatima holds up completely. I've been here in dry heat, we've had a thunderstorm with rain, its all gone in a few minutes. No miracle at all. There is a thing in science which basically states that the greater the claim, the greater the evidence required. If you think there is a god, fine, let him provide the whole world with clear unquestioning evidence, its never happenened. But lots of gullible and deluded people are common.
Go to any mental asylum and you have 3-4 new versions of Jesus a day...
What I am saying is either let nature take its course or don't.
If you interfere with nature to preserve life as we do, ok. Then
accept that we also interfere with nature regards pregnancy etc.
I accept the laws of nature. I accept how there is a balance.
If we interfere in one sphere, we should also interfere in the other, or the whole thing is out of balance. If you understand biology a bit, you'll also understand how that will eventually lead to the collapse of humanity in the end. I also understand that you are not a biologist and believe in a gods plan etc, so its harder
to discuss these points.