The Forum > Article Comments > Religion, social attitudes and politics > Comments
Religion, social attitudes and politics : Comments
By Mark Bahnisch, published 5/7/2007Family First, and Tony Abbott style politics, are a symptom of a cultural shift away from religiously inspired social values rather than evidence of a revival.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
-
- All
So many "believers" don't know what they believe - they just can't think for themselves, and want to be part of a club.
But it's not just confined to the "groovy churches", as you put it. Rather, I'd suggest that the supermarket Catholics are a good example of what you've described. I have encountered so many "Catholics" who would identify themselves as such in a census, and involve themselves in other club activities like inflicting religious rituals on tiny babies, but who do not adhere to even just the big ticket tenets of their "faith".
And the same goes for members of other mainstream religions.
As much as I have a huge problem with the way Pell conducted himself when wading into the debate about the recent conscience vote on stem cell research, I have to admit he's got a point. If you don't actually believe large chunks of the club's teachings, and if you don't want to adhere to their rules, you should opt out. (I reckon if people were honest with themselves in this regard, we'd see some very interesting figures in the next census...)
But that's cool, as long as they don't try to inflict their "beliefs" on me. Which brings me to the whackos who argue that secular humanism is a religion. Pay no heed - they're just trying to drag you down to their level. They can't seem to grasp the idea of simply not following a religion at all - of opting out altogether, instead of just picking a different club from the next bloke.