The Forum > Article Comments > Risking women's health, breaching Australia's laws > Comments
Risking women's health, breaching Australia's laws : Comments
By Jocelynne Scutt, published 11/5/2007Confidentiality and privacy laws are little protection against the determined anti-abortionist.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Page 9
- 10
- 11
-
- All


Really, maybe you could justify your crass attitude.
“Those laws are made by other human beings, and they have nothing to guide them in deciding what is a just law,”
Not right, seems you are “ignorant” in the process of law making.
As a voter I elect a representative to pass laws on my behalf and among those laws, about 30 years or so ago the laws, which had been in existence for about 120 years, which made abortion a criminal offence, were repealed.
“And why should the lawmaking process be placed in the hands of atheists, and Christians excluded simply because they have an identifiable set of moral values?”
Well we are back to the will of the democratic majority. If you have a problem with that you should write to your member of parliament because writing to the undemocratically appointed Pope will make no difference (only a minority of people listen to him).
On a point of interest, abortion is not about a new born child. We are talking about a pre-born embryo. Birth is an important point in the development cycle.
It is the point at which we acknowledge the individual and separation from the mother. A small point, we have “birth certificates”, we do not have “conception certificates”.
Your claim that the protections afforded a separate individual should apply to an embryo. Embryos are entirely dependent upon the bodily resources of a particular individual. A new born can be cared for by anyone (within reason) typically, should a woman die in child birth and the baby survives. The same is not true of a woman who dies before the birth, the embryo generally dies with her (dependency).
“The verbal garbage you churn out”.
That you cannot deal with being in the minority is your problem, maybe it is due to your tiny, limited intellect. Does the D stand for “Dullard”?
You fail to sway the debate.