The Forum > Article Comments > A gross miscarriage of justice > Comments
A gross miscarriage of justice : Comments
By Bernie Matthews, published 7/5/2007The scales of justice no longer seem sit equally in New South Wales.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Page 6
- 7
-
- All
Kilos if you are right and Hamlet is a judge then no wonder the legal system is a joke.You are probably right as a judge is more likely to use Hamlet as a pseudonym than a copper.
Posted by alanpoi, Wednesday, 9 May 2007 2:00:30 PM
| |
Hamlet is very good at sticking up for the powers of police. His stance in the Hurley debate demonstrated this.
I also note that Hamlet is a little vocal when it comes to Indigenous issues. From the stance that hamlet and clan take on the issue of sexual abuse in Indigenous communities one could assume that if the same rules applied this case would engender the assumption that all cops are the same and somehow flawed via some imagined link. From the legalese that Hamlet is so fond of maybe it means that Hamlet is not a cop, or a judge but a cleaner in a courtroom, or a prison guard. Maybe Hurley will share a cell with Power if he is convicted. I just hope for Power's sake that he doesn't get Hurleyed. Posted by Aka, Wednesday, 9 May 2007 2:19:08 PM
| |
Another great article Bernie.
I say, put the bastards in mainstream and let the population sort them out. These people are the worst people on earth and they are usually the ones in power. It’s very sickening. Posted by Fruityfee, Wednesday, 9 May 2007 2:20:11 PM
| |
Hi Bernie, thanks for a great article. I have followed the Roseanne Catt matter for years and am glad that she is finally free. But what I have always wondered about is what happened to Barry Catt's previous wife, the mother of children? What did he do to her?
Can you find out? Posted by RaggedtyAnnie, Thursday, 10 May 2007 10:50:52 AM
| |
I have trawled through those judgements and all I can say is 'who would be a judge/jurist?' - that anyone can 'judge' the 'truth' and the 'facts' from all that is beyond my belief!
Whether then it is a 'miscarriage', 'not proven' or 'not guilty' I just don't know. I suppose if there is doubt ... Power's part in it? He had one but with what motive apart from work I don't know. Regardless there were some very clever or very cunning operatives at work and at many levels. And for what? If it is/was just to be vindictive, it is astounding. If there is something deeper there (a conspiracy), it is even more alarming. The article provoked much thought; but few conclusions. Again, thanks. Posted by aka-Ian, Thursday, 10 May 2007 11:31:49 AM
| |
You might want to check this site out
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200705/s1919747.htm The plot thickens. Posted by Aka, Thursday, 10 May 2007 5:59:52 PM
|