The Forum > Article Comments > Why Cuba is a democracy and the US is not > Comments
Why Cuba is a democracy and the US is not : Comments
By Tim Anderson, published 15/3/2007Cuba and the US head to head: let's compare governments, democracy and civil rights.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Page 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- ...
- 12
- 13
- 14
-
- All
Posted by Grey, Friday, 16 March 2007 8:47:04 AM
| |
For a look at the 'great' universal health care that cubans receive...
http://www.therealcuba.com/Page10.htm Posted by Grey, Friday, 16 March 2007 9:03:31 AM
| |
The Real Cuba Libre
Ingredients: 1 chunk Ice, preferably crushed Juice of 1 Lime 8 cl Rum (Havana club) 1 shot Coca-Cola Mixing instructions: sit outside on balcony, fill glass with crushed ice, sqeeze lime, hold glass up to the sky (best effect during sunset), pour rum up to horizon , add some coke to cover the sky (no overflow), stir smoothly, lean back & ENJOY! Maximum effect with bass heavy dub reggae in the backgroun Posted by its not easy being, Friday, 16 March 2007 10:15:27 AM
| |
The Cuban Socialist Constitution of 1976 provides the framework of Anderson's article. He quotes from it extensively to prove that Cubans enjoy even greater rights than are accorded Americans under the U.S. Constitution. This fantasy is sustainable only by ignoring Article 62 of Castro's constitution. This Article in effect takes way all the rights granted in the other articles:
ARTICLE 62. None of the freedoms granted to citizens may be exercised against the provisions of the Constitution and the laws, nor against the existence and objectives of the socialist State, nor against the Cuban people's decision to construct socialism and communism. Violation of this principle is punishable. In this respect the Cuban Socialist Constitution of 1976 is identical to the Stalinist Constitution of 1936, which also negated the very rights it granted when exercised against the interests of the one-party state. Posted by Cubano, Saturday, 17 March 2007 2:39:57 AM
| |
Just to correct an historical error.
Those boat loads of women were in fact bought to Australia. However they were not prostitutes. They were young women and widows bought here from England by Caroline Chisholm. They were initially housed in protected and secure buildings in Sydney and later taken by wagon and literally deposited at the gates of single men working farms in NSW and Victoria. Chisholm and Macquarrie organised the scheme in response to the debauchery in Sydney at the time. It partly worked. It resulted in an exdous of men from Sydney. Australia's development and time are its greatest proof. (Although I suspect Sydney's reputation hasn't changed ...much.:-)) I believe Chisholm was the mother of modern Australia and she was once honoured on our currency. Posted by keith, Saturday, 17 March 2007 2:30:15 PM
| |
A sure way to test whether country A is more democratic than country B is to see the number of people emigraing to that country. There are more people leaving Cuba for the US than the other way round. So I reckon that Cuba is less democratic than the US.
Castro has been in power since ..... time immemorial, like Mao when he was alive. Is China a democracy? If the article were written in April 1st, I'd say its an April fool joke, since its not I am still looking for a word to describe it. Posted by Philip Tang, Saturday, 17 March 2007 3:18:29 PM
|
As other posters have also said, the truth of the bad situation in Cuba is evidenced by the thousands of people who risk their lives every year to escape to America.
It is also important to realise there is no freedom of information in Cuba. What the government says or decides to show it's visitors is all they get to 'know' about Cuba. I doubt that is Tim's concern though, as he seems merely hell bent on trying to cast a totalitarian communist dictatorship as a better democracy than the US. An absurd notion to anyone who knows anything about communism.
Stop lying Tim.