The Forum > Article Comments > There is a case for staying the course in Iraq > Comments
There is a case for staying the course in Iraq : Comments
By Leslie Cannold, published 22/2/2007The pottery store rule of causal obligation: you break it, you own it. The least we can do is fix up the mess in Iraq - sans dictator of course.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
-
- All
If you weren't so clearly ignorant of the situation in Iraq I'd suspect you'd sold out merely to be anti-Labor.
You know there is little opportunity for Western aid workers in Iraq to do any rebuilding. Its too dangerous. The few aid people there need to sleep in bunkers in the Green Zone (fortress) of Bagdhad and have armed escorts whenever they travel out of it.
Most Iraqis dislike/hate Westerners - for good reason. The longer Coalition troops are there the longer they will have to fight (and be fought by) Iraqi insurgents supported by Iran and Saudi Arabia.
The country is in a perpetual state of counterinsurgency. Fighting, guns, no hearts and minds or rebuilding for years.
Cornflower
I agree that the parallels with Vietnam are clear.
As in Vietnam - we had to bomb villages to liberate it - hey Leslie?
Leslie's primitive logic "you break it - you own it" forgets that the Coalition has no God given right (sorry Boazy) to own Iraq.
There has been no discernable progress (in terms of lower civilian casualties) from the current troop levels in Iraq.
So how can a continued presence improve the situation? Would Leslie want to increase the numbers of Coalition (including Australian) troop levels - in line with Mr Howard's policy?
Pete