The Forum > Article Comments > Core curriculum as rubbery as ‘core promises’? > Comments
Core curriculum as rubbery as ‘core promises’? : Comments
By Cathy Byrne, published 15/2/2007A national curriculum for Religion Education - what a marvellously simple item for the agenda … but whose agenda?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
-
- All
Could someone tell me why we are talking about how religion should be taught in State schools?
Who decided we were going to teach religion in State schools?
I thought State schools were secular. I thought Australia did not have an established church.
Of course it would be beneficial for students to know about religions, but surely this would be done through History, Geography, Social Studies - or whatever the current curriculum lingo is.
Is someone being sneaky by talking about how we teach Religion as a separate subject when we should'nt even be talking about whether.