The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Right wing columnists - anti-democratic? > Comments

Right wing columnists - anti-democratic? : Comments

By Mark Bahnisch, published 15/2/2007

Book review: Niall Lucy and Steve Mickler’s 'The War on Democracy: Conservative Opinion in the Australian Press'.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All
Wow....I think the city of moonbatville has had it's population go up by one.

Trying to claim that there are only 'token lefties' at the Australian is hilarious. Unless you are an extremely left person (being a sociology lecturer [and at Griffith at that] this seems quite likely), and count anyone to the right of you as conservative this sort of comment is ludicrous.
Posted by Grey, Thursday, 15 February 2007 9:43:13 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
s/oppose/impose
Posted by Grey, Thursday, 15 February 2007 10:01:31 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
At least these newspapers are not paid for by the taxpayer. Our taxpayer funded national broadcasters are nothing more than propaganda vehicles for the lefties. The sooner the public purse is pulled on these marxist the better. It would be good tp turn them into sporting channels.
Posted by runner, Thursday, 15 February 2007 10:33:33 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Ignoring the claims of post modernists, which are beyond me in their wilful complexity and arguments on reality and claiming that the most important role of the media in a democracy is reporting the news completely and honestly.
I would argue that the electorate gains most of the information on which they base their ‘informed vote’ derives from this. I would agree that the media in general has become a diatribe of opinionated posturing with aims of the owners and commercial success looming larger than their function.
The Iraq war is the latest example of reporting to support an aim just as the leaked ‘Downing Street Memo” claimed.
To be semi informed at the risk of being foolish in the claims one makes requires long hours surfing the web seeking truth and information.
The most recent to come to my attention and whilst I can’t claim diligent search of the media it does seem to be underreported or omitted.
This concerns the view that rapid withdrawal form Iraq, becoming any withdrawal in the politics of the day in the immediate future, certainly no telegraphing of intent. Such it is said would incite the ‘terrorists’ incited by our presence and actions to further efforts.
Withdrawal also involves reduction of effort by the Coalition Provisional Authority. See paper by Christopher Doran entitled ‘A Militarised Neo-Liberalism: Australia’s Economic Politics in Post Saddam Iraq”
Further search leads to Antonia Juhatsz amongst others. The author cites many references which should be checked plus some of the contrary facts , if any a tedious time consuming effort but necessary if the media is not doing its job.
This in turn leads to the pre planning for commercialisation of post invasion Iraq by Bearing Point, formerly KPMG Consulting (Arthur Anderson) turning Iraq over to Betchel, Chevron, Halliburton, Exxon and others.
Gives cause to wonder about the vehemence of no withdrawal. But the current world is so full of disinformation, (Competition) as to require more checking.
Please check!
Posted by untutored mind, Thursday, 15 February 2007 10:53:18 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Christopher writes reasonably well when he remembers to take his little blue pills - and he does ache for an appointment to one of howard's boards.
Whereas Janet just wants to retain her nice little earner as a member (chosen for her "talent" :-) by the 'lying rodent' of course) of the board of the ABC.
Yes that's the ABC that many of those who are a little right of adolf hitler C-O-N-T-I-N-U-A-L-L-Y and never endingly claim that it has views to left of joseph stalin. If the-our- ABC upsets you precious petals then PLEASE! switch to the commercial stations, or get a knowledgeable person to operate your remote, the programmes on these channels would be more in line with your intelligence, I mean you do not have to think. Regards, numbat
Posted by numbat, Thursday, 15 February 2007 11:37:49 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Is is just me, oe does anyone else think the Australian print media and radio is overburdened with opinion? I can't comment on TV as I don't watch it. I looked at the SMH this morning and found two broadsheet pages filled with letters, two editorials and three opinion columns. It's enough to make you choke on your Weet Bix.

Aside from the occassional column by Hugh Mackay (which contains useful tidbits drawn from his qualitative research), most of it is fit only to line the budgie cage with.

If I want an opinion on current affairs, I'll form one for myself, thanks all the same.
Posted by Johnj, Thursday, 15 February 2007 12:42:12 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy