The Forum > Article Comments > Green fundamentalism > Comments
Green fundamentalism : Comments
By Richard Castles, published 1/12/2006'Repent now or pay later' is the solemn warning of the Stern Report.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Page 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- ...
- 13
- 14
- 15
-
- All
Richard42, you're recycling old doubts. The Iris Effect (as others have tagged it) is an old favs of Lomborgs & i see the American Chemical Society recently put out that 2001 finding in a press pack http://www.newsguide.us/education/science/ACS-News-Service-Weekly-PressPac-Nov-15-2006/?date=2006-11-20
without, surprise surprise, acknowledging any of the subsequent research. Getting desperate or what!
Evidence contrary to the Iris Effect theory, e.g.
Study Finds Thicker Storm Clouds Over Warmer Tropical Waters, Affect Climate
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/09/020920071736.htm
NASA SATELLITE INSTRUMENT WARMS UP GLOBAL COOLING THEORY
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/NasaNews/2002/200201167312.html
http://www.scienceblog.com/community/older/2002/D/20024162.html
This link from Scientific American covers it much better than i could..
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=00040A72-A95C-1CDA-B4A8809EC588EEDF&pageNumber=5&catID=9
On water vapour, we knew it played a role a century ago, what exactly is the relevance of your reference to SVCs?
I'm pleased to agree Richard that CO2 is not the sole cause of global warming, but then so does everybody who can read. I'd suggest you read any high school primer on the subject, it breaks down the relative roles of CO2, CO, CH4, SO2, H2O, HFCs etc