The Forum > Article Comments > The dangerous myth of tsunami greenbelts > Comments
The dangerous myth of tsunami greenbelts : Comments
By Andrew Baird, published 15/11/2006Bad science is being used to justify worse policy in the tsunami affected regions.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
Posted by richard42, Wednesday, 15 November 2006 10:26:45 AM
| |
The concept of buffers has been one of the most abused and unsubstantiated methods in a broad range of environmental management fields.
It allows the mediocre to draw lines on a map of land that is effectively acquired for public purposes at no cost. And as the author so ably points out, they are a complete cop-out. But from my understanding of Tsunami dynamics they are worse than merely useless, they actually exacerbate the problem. As any resident of the Brisbane bayside will testify, mangroves obscure the view. And this ensures that communities are totally dependent on electronic warning systems that may not even work. And the worst damage is not caused by the water itself but rather, by the floating debris that is smashed into both humans and their structures. A mangrove or forest produces the perfect killing debris, it floats. Bricks and cement may crumble but they also settle sooner. Once again, the abstract green whimsies of distant, unaffected daytrippers are being allowed to threaten the very lives of ordinary people. Posted by Perseus, Thursday, 16 November 2006 11:38:57 AM
| |
lets try again recent post rejected heres what i was told
Dear layla, Your general discussion thread entitled "The Drought And Weather Control" has been rejected by the moderator. Sorry. You're joking surely. Regards, National Forum Administrator haarp is a weather control machine designed to control the weather heres the link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlORegrdVXM idoubt this will be allowed on here as they the moderators are scared it will get out otherwise why would they delet my previuos post peace layla Posted by laymemadly, Thursday, 16 November 2006 2:43:02 PM
| |
Um, ok, layme.
Don't mean to sound like a conspiracy theorist myself, but there seems to be a strong element of socialist thought underlying this tsunami greenbelt idea. One of the best ways to attack capitalism is to undermine private property rights. I would think that forced resettlement along the coasts would affect the property rights of a large proportion of the population. No surprise that it came out of Scandinavia. Posted by dozer, Thursday, 16 November 2006 4:15:25 PM
| |
What I want to know is, has our $Billion in aid to tsunami victims been hijacked to assist these goons in their policy of dispossession?
Can anyone clarrify this issue? Posted by Perseus, Tuesday, 21 November 2006 9:57:56 AM
|
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
the article discusses chevrons. There is a photograph of a chevron on the south end of madagascar 600' high, and 3 miles inland, mangroves aren't going to help here. The graphic is informative too, quite a few sites and impacts in Australia, interesting that the researchers used Google Earth in their work
Richard42