The Forum > Article Comments > Understanding the retiring kind > Comments
Understanding the retiring kind : Comments
By Myra Hamilton and Clive Hamilton, published 9/10/2006As the baby boomers age, compulsory super has made some interesting transformations in the relationship between citizens and government.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
As a genuine baby boomer (b 1946) I stated work as a public servant at age 20. I was able to retire at age 56 on a comfortable pension guaranteed for life with a pro rata pension for my wife after my death if she outlasts me.
Many others, especially management/executives also had superannuation available, if not required, long before it became universal.
Most baby boomers who did not have super until it became compulsory won't have built up a big enough fund to make a significant difference to their retirement. Continuing work after 65 still won't enable them to build up a large nest egg.
It is the generations after the baby boomers which will be most affected. They will not only have to save for their own retirement but also pay taxes to support the retired baby boomers.