The Forum > Article Comments > SIEV X - a helpless human cargo > Comments
SIEV X - a helpless human cargo : Comments
By Tony Kevin, published 12/10/2006The fifth anniversary of the sinking of SIEV X: and why it still matters.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Page 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
-
- All
I know some of the managements staff previously from Baxter in SA. The TV’s and other fittings which were deliberately destroyed around that detention centre were charged off to the detainees who threw them, although who knows if they ever paid for there abusive behaviour.
Like you rightly said,
“I think we need to get away from the notion that it is oppressive or unnecessarily undignified to hold asylum seekers in detention centres, and just realise the practicalities involved.
So all-considered, I think Australia’s humanitarian treatment of these people has not been too bad over the last decade. It could certainly have been a lot worse, or become a lot worse with a poorer handling of the whole saga.”
Here, Here, Ludwig, we differ on so much but in this we concur.
When I saw a few years ago on TV the rabble of dirty anarchists trying to tear down the razor wire and facilitate the escape from legal internment of illegal entrants to these shores, I realized who else deserves to be locked up.
David BOAZ, I concur with your statement.
I recall the comments made back when Nixon visited China, Apparently Nixon got onto the topic of the right of people to freely migrate and China’s official attitude of non-migration. The official Chinese response was, OK you want refugees, how many do you want 10 million, 20 million?
Nixon did not pursue the offer.
It is all well and good do-gooders tossing around and wearing sackcloth and ashes berating government and the rest of us with their infantile views on the rights of illegal immigrants (OK Marilyn, you say they are “legal” and I say by that by attempting to circumvent the Australian migration laws they are “illegal”). I believe that illegal immigrants are not a special case, they do not deserve to move to “head of the queue” simply because they paid for a boat to get ahead of others who have respected the processes Australia put in place to manage the orderly patronization of refugees.