The Forum > Article Comments > 9-11: treason in the academic comfort zone? > Comments
9-11: treason in the academic comfort zone? : Comments
By Mervyn Bendle, published 11/9/2006There has been a scandalous lethargy among the Australian intelligentsia in terrorism research.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Page 6
-
- All
I think money, contracts and reputations will always influence the output of intelligence analysts BUT academics as well.
A frustration I have with sociologists or philosophers trying to approach counter terrorism issues is that they often just harp on the universal questions that are part of their discipline. For example they ask:
- do you need security services in today's society?
- should identified terrorist groups be given a forum for their grievances?
- prove that security services are not the presumed thought police of society?
From these humble beginnings comes nothing new and the public just assume its a bunch of leftys ranting – and return to making money (as you say).
What complicates your picture of government paid onesidedness is that:
- intelligence analysts ARE frequently leftwing, some of the better ones go further, preferring anarchism. This makes their analyses different and in conflict – which means a better argued result.
- Intelligence analysis agencies rely on academics passing through (on multi year contracts) or stopping there permanently to provide the necessary expertise and diversity.
Some of these people go on to the Monash/Macquarie centres Bendle refers to. Basically they’ve seen the spook bureaucratic world. They know what value to place on classified streams of information and they are now slightly less constrained on what they say. They can also talk to all the types on campus etc.
So, I think, an expansion of the existing interplay between academia and intelligence agencies is preferable to “novice academics disciplines” reinventing the wheel in the counter terrorism area.
Flezzey in the absence of any other former insiders writing on this string (if not in all of OLO?) you’ll have to take on trust and skepticism my personalised/dated(?) account of the Australian intelligence world. If it was the US we’d have many more ex (or current) insiders voicing their opinions. Then again you could read my blog.
Pete
http://spyingbadthings.blogspot.com/