The Forum > Article Comments > Genetically modified crops will cost > Comments
Genetically modified crops will cost : Comments
By James Norman and Louise Sales, published 14/8/2006The economics and risks associated with genetically engineered crops just don’t add up.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Page 16
-
- All
Posted by Steve Madden, Thursday, 28 September 2006 3:28:08 PM
| |
Safe, can you talk us through how clearance by FSANZ, FDA, OGTR, BMA, WHO, etc, and 10 years of consumption by the most hypochondriacal and litigious society in the world, without substantiated incident, isn't sufficient proof that GM foods are unlikely to kill us; yet the appointment of 1 person who previously worked at Monsanto (among other past employers) means you "have proven that the Governments of the world are manipulated by GM corporations"?
Sorry to be slow to comprehend this, but I'm afraid I may have rationality in that part of the brain where paranoia is obviously meant to be... ;) Posted by ScienceLaw, Friday, 29 September 2006 6:29:05 PM
| |
Even better, GM crops are also helping farmers better manage drought.
http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=19740 GM crops saving farm economy from drought - HEARTLAND INSTITUTE, By James M. Taylor, October 1, 2006 An August 11 federal government crop report shows biotechnology is saving the Midwestern farm economy from devastation in the wake of this summer's prolonged drought. The report projects 10.98 billion bushels of corn production this year, up from 10.74 billion bushels projected in the federal government's July forecast. The report also projects a soybean crop that will come within 5 percent of last year's record. The August forecast for the two crops is striking because severe drought ravaged the Midwest between the July and August forecasts. "The biotechnology has improved corn and soybeans to be able to withstand some of the Mother Nature pressures that we have gotten," said Kevin Dahlman, president of Dahlco Seeds in Cokato, Minnesota. Crop losses due to a similar drought would have been substantial as recently as a decade ago, Dahlman added. Genetically enhanced seeds account for 61 percent of this year's corn crop and 89 percent of this year's soybean crop. "If we look at what scientists in the United States and elsewhere have already developed, and what they currently are developing in the research pipeline, it is genuinely remarkable," said Gregory Conko, director of food safety policy at the Washington, DC-based Competitive Enterprise Institute. "We have to be cautiously optimistic, though, since developing a product that works is only half the battle," Conko warned. "All around the world, important biotech advances are being stymied by bad regulation and opposition by radical greens." Posted by Agronomist, Wednesday, 18 October 2006 4:59:36 PM
|
I am an old dude with leukeamia living on the sunny coast in Qld. Sorry I have never been to Adelaide.
You never did answer my questions, Should DDT still be banned? Do you agree with spraying bacteriophages (viruses) on food?
Another one, Should food be irradiated?
Plus
http://www.csiro.au/csiro/content/file/pfz,,.html
GM cotton reduces water usage by 10%. Greenpeace will spin this one too.