The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Doha closes, another opens > Comments

Doha closes, another opens : Comments

By Mark Thirwell, published 28/7/2006

Despite the Doha round's death, there remains hope for global trade.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All
An article in last week's Guardian headed - "Globalisation has had its Day" by Martin Jaques, Research Fellow, London School of Economics - ends with the paragraph:

The death of Doha is an early dress rehearsal for the end of globalisation. Those who bury it will be those who designed it and proselytised for it - the US and Europe.

Certainly it is the US now as so-called unipolar global leader in both politics and economics, who should be loudly condemned. This includes our John Howard, who is certainly proving the words of social scientists, that Howard has the political knack but not the historical knowledge.

As farmers one of our hopes regarding the Doha Round was an ethical arrangement to end agricultural subsidies, Australian farmers being the only ones in the Western world now not being subsidised.

Not that Aussie farmers have been crying to be subsidised, it is a fact that the US and EU the main culprits, can use subsidies not only in a party political way, as George W Bush has done, but can also dump cheap subsidised products on non-Western markets as they have done in South America encouraging farmers to grow drugs.

So it looks like the main culprits will still hold the big end of the stick, similar to the way both America and Britain have still won their way with the UN, the US still crippling the UN with a wornout veto which should have been chucked out with the end of the Cold War.

Both in global economics and politics never has our world needed Immanuel Kant's idea of a democratic global federation than it does right now
Posted by bushbred, Friday, 28 July 2006 11:16:29 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Did a Dodo write this piece.
Mark Thirwell began:
"Even in the aftermath of the latest, sadly predictable, failure in the world trade talks in Geneva . . ."
Now if it was sadly predicable this article would have been written before the trade talks.
It was not written before the trade talks because he writes "the aftermath".
The opening line destroys any credibility that the article has.
Why did not Mark tell all the people going to the trade talks that they were going to fail. That would have been a good article and for his reason he could then say it was "sadly predictable". That's why.
Posted by GlenWriter, Friday, 28 July 2006 12:51:02 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy