The Forum > Article Comments > Quality teaching - extending the blowtorch > Comments
Quality teaching - extending the blowtorch : Comments
By Monika Kruesmann, published 24/4/2006To bring the reality of lifelong learning in Australia into line with discourse, the debate about teacher quality needs to be broadened.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
-
- All
Your comments on my points 1 & 2 - I am not saying that we shouldn't have private schools and I too am pro choice. But you don't rob Peter to pay Paul... you put enough money in to finance both so that ALL get the benefits of a good education. Both should be funded properly!
3. Private schools are a business and so are State schools, why can't people see that? The first law of business is to fund it properly - see above again. Your cinema argument doesn't really apply... as another cinema isn't forced to to take the riff raff expelled from the first cinema. State schools do have to take the expelled private school kids. Private schools should have to deal with their own problems... and solve them themselves ... not dump them into the state system.
4. I might agree (depending how it was done)that it might be better done in a school that specialised in such illneses but... they won't fund more support teachers so I doubt if they will fund other institutions ... even if the greater benefits were proven.
7. Shorbe ... many people do unpaid overtime and it is all wrong... Go stand point duty in a classroom for 7 hours a day... then get back to me on their remuneration package.
Education in all areas has been underfunded for years and is full of top heavy departments. I am not against private schools ... it is the diversion of funds from the State to the private that I am against. Fund both of them better.
As for taxpayers having choice.... that is a bit of a furfy.... most low income earners have no choice whatsoever in eductaion.