The Forum > Article Comments > IR reform no bad thing > Comments
IR reform no bad thing : Comments
By Graeme Haycroft, published 27/3/2006There may have been dire warnings, gnashing of teeth, and impassioned wailing, but really the new IR legislation is not a radical change.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
-
- All
In the 1970s I worked in an un-unionised industry and the standard arrangement was that we took time in lieu when we were called in to fix something at night - people never took their time in lieu. A colleague marked his card when he asked for 3 months off, being the time in lieu that he was owed. It was a great relief when the industry went to paid overtime and minimum call out rates.
Last year I signed an AWA that covered conditions for full time employees - pay rate, hours per week. Unfortunately the AWA didn't cover the casual employee conditions - which was negligent really because all employees were casuals. I was asked to work at 2 hours notice and when I got to the site I was told I wasn't needed. I said that wasn't fair then I discovered there was no minimum pay for being called out, so I had wasted petrol getting to a job that wasn't. This was a low paid job and people who need that money can't afford to mucked around and these IR laws do not protect the low paid worker.
The government's desire to reduce the wages of Australian workers will reduce the worker's disposable income so that demand for non-essential goods and services will fall. Companies that supply non-essential goods and services will see their Australian market disappear and will be forced to find export markets or go out of business. Most Australian firms are too small to break into the American market.