The Forum > Article Comments > Indigenous significance not significant enough > Comments
Indigenous significance not significant enough : Comments
By Andrew Macintosh and Deb Wilkinson, published 13/3/2006So much for the Prime Minister’s 'progressive spirit of the Enlightenment'.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
John Howard misrepresenting his government's 'actual' policy on an incredibly important issue to this nation? No, surely not, he is just sooooooo honest....
It is high time Indigenous Affairs are given the status they deserve in the realm of political debate in this country. As the authour correctly notes, the protection of Indigenous cultural heritage sites both on a State and Federal level is nothing short of disgraceful. The fact that ten's of thousands of years of history is able to be bulldozed so easily by land clearers or developers is something that consistently shocks me, yet it somehow receives little public acknowledgement. I'm sure if someone wanted to build a new suburb on-top of Sir Donald Bradman's grave the entire country would start kicking and yelling. But when it comes to the desecration of Indigenous burial grounds and sacred sites there is little or no outcry, and the affected peoples are left with no option but costly litigation in the land and environment court. I personally am not proud to live in a country that values its sporting greats over that of its Indigenous peoples. Surely there is a rationale for ensuring we protect the heritage of ALL people in this country, rather than compromising it for economic gain??