The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Greenpeace rejects violent tactics > Comments

Greenpeace rejects violent tactics : Comments

By Dan Cass, published 16/1/2006

Dan Cass argues Graham Young should not be pitting himself against the mainstream media.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. Page 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. All
Tubley “This is my final word to you, Rouge.”

Excellent!
However, somehow I doubt you will keep your promise.

JT_dontmesswitme – “You have got no idea what you are talking about in any matter of any situation.” Blah blah all the way through to “GO GREENPEACE! YOU GUYS ROCK!”

You writing style resembles that of an arrogant but lowly educated ponce.

Doubtless you may have what you think passes as tertiary qualifications, from which you most likely derive your posturing and prancing nancy attitude.

So, you will be surprised to hear, far from having no idea about anything, I have been competitively tested and duly accredited with several esteemed and world renown professional qualifications, the like of which are beyond your reach and possibly even beyond your comprehension.

So as for “give us all a break”

Sorry, whilst I could oblige , I will not.

I kow-tow to no one, least of all some “greenie fascist” who has deluded himself that he has the right to curb me or anyone else at this site or any other or in any media.

So bring on your worst but somehow I think you are just not up to much.

David Latimer – I would agree with your observation regarding “forced sterilisation”.

If you were to read what I wrote, you will see I said

“Want to “Save the world”?
Go and sterilise the underdeveloped nations.”

The observation is not a “recommendation” but comment to give balance to those who, like Green Peace and PETA, feel compelled to “Save the world” by pushing their anarchist actions down everyone else’s throat but conveniently ignore the most critical and fundamental source of crisis, that of the accellerating "human population explosion”.

That clarified, I will be happy to hear your suggestions to resolve this "Real Issue".
Posted by Col Rouge, Friday, 20 January 2006 12:43:57 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Col Rouge, you're writing style sounds like that of a highly educated, stuck up rich prick with no morals. All you have just done is back up everything I just said. You're post acchieved nothing. From what I could see your basic goal was to insult me, it didn't work. Nothing you could say or do can possibly effect me in any way shape or form. Anything you could possibly post I will ALWAYS have a comeback for, so get used to me always bein here.

In response to whatever other crap you barked at me, if you open you're eyes you will see that you're "George W. Bush" style views are what is wrong with our world. Answer me this, do you get off on seeing whales dragged from their homes and gutted? Do you get off on seeing blown up Iraqi children all because mr Bush was feeling trigger happy one day? Because the kind of things you say certainly make it sound like that. You have some serious issues to work out Rouge. Next time you post, think about us poor helpless souls who have to read it!
Posted by JT_dontmesswitme, Friday, 20 January 2006 4:42:26 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Khmer,
Refer your posts 17 Jan, 18 Jan

17th Jan Want to save the world? Sterilise the underdeveloped countries
18th Jan I didn't say that

Khmer,
Congratulations, you are a man amoungst men, not many of your age, having already established arogance and stupidity as you have can add liar to their CV, only you could do Khmer, and as for big bad description of yourself, lol, I would be surprised if you are taller than 5'5" as you display all of the symptoms of "small man syndrome" as for bad, I would fear you, like a sniffle, you poor old bloke.

Greenpeace are a reputable organisation, something that you would not understand being a financial advisor, being rated one place above used car salesmen.
Posted by SHONGA, Friday, 20 January 2006 8:45:48 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Col, I think I have been quite reasonable and restrained in my postings to your ideas and ideals. I have suggested balance and have attempted to give you latitude in the face of posts that linger on the cutting edge of white supremacist ranting.
As for me, I think you have made yourself irrelevant to any meaningful dialogue of human interaction.

“The point of my comment was not to ascribe fault or blame.
I hold a particular view, that everyone is responsible for their own actions.”

Whether you read this post or reply does not concern me in the slightest for, as the above quotation points out unmistakably, you do not read your own either.

adieu, Col Rouge. It has been a most unedifying experience
Posted by Craig Blanch, Friday, 20 January 2006 9:43:26 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Mr Rouge

You must spend an awful lot of time at this site. I have been reading all of your posts. Have your numerous qualifications enabled you to live a life which allows you so much spare time?

Unfortunately, this particular debate seems to have degenerated into a slanging match where you have taken on the role of pompous big brother, self righteous and superior, questioning anybody else's "qualifications" and right to post their views.

Mrs Robinson
Posted by Mrs Robinson, Friday, 20 January 2006 10:14:38 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
JT_dontmesswitme, your opinion of me is completely irrelevant.

However, do not let that stop you, your display of ignorance has prevailed in your previous posts and will, I am sure, increase the more you practice.

Shonga – petulance becomes you.

Craig Blanch so we are here for your edicifaction? Must say, though, I did appreciate your “reasonableness” and “restraint”. Would you like that as an epitaph

“Here lies Craig Blanch, a man who showed reasonableness and restraint in the face of an opposing opinion”

Unfortunately, It is as inspiring an observation as suggesting you wore carpet slippers with zips and enjoyed a boiled egg for breakfast.

I take your last post to concede, your views are essentially Quixotic. Tilting a lance at windmills suites your interests more than dealing with real issues.

Mrs Robinson, how I spend my time is for me to decide and does not require your approval in any form or at any level. However, as seems to be the case, it makes good research for you.

Conversely, for me to research how you spend your time would likely be an exercise of cataloguing the banal.

Now for all of you to consider, I have been researching something suitable, tempted by dear Margaret Thatcher, (Oh I do indulge myself with her quotations) I did resist initially and searched far and wide. I considered Donald Rumsfeld, even Brendan Behan but finally came back to Margaret

“I always cheer up immensely if an attack is particularly wounding because I think, well, if they attack one personally, it means they have not a single political argument left.”

Although, almost sadly, your collected rhetoric has the wounding effect similar to that delivered by a small bucket of earthworms.
Posted by Col Rouge, Saturday, 21 January 2006 12:14:00 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. Page 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy