The Forum > Article Comments > Greenpeace rejects violent tactics > Comments
Greenpeace rejects violent tactics : Comments
By Dan Cass, published 16/1/2006Dan Cass argues Graham Young should not be pitting himself against the mainstream media.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Page 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
-
- All
Excellent!
However, somehow I doubt you will keep your promise.
JT_dontmesswitme – “You have got no idea what you are talking about in any matter of any situation.” Blah blah all the way through to “GO GREENPEACE! YOU GUYS ROCK!”
You writing style resembles that of an arrogant but lowly educated ponce.
Doubtless you may have what you think passes as tertiary qualifications, from which you most likely derive your posturing and prancing nancy attitude.
So, you will be surprised to hear, far from having no idea about anything, I have been competitively tested and duly accredited with several esteemed and world renown professional qualifications, the like of which are beyond your reach and possibly even beyond your comprehension.
So as for “give us all a break”
Sorry, whilst I could oblige , I will not.
I kow-tow to no one, least of all some “greenie fascist” who has deluded himself that he has the right to curb me or anyone else at this site or any other or in any media.
So bring on your worst but somehow I think you are just not up to much.
David Latimer – I would agree with your observation regarding “forced sterilisation”.
If you were to read what I wrote, you will see I said
“Want to “Save the world”?
Go and sterilise the underdeveloped nations.”
The observation is not a “recommendation” but comment to give balance to those who, like Green Peace and PETA, feel compelled to “Save the world” by pushing their anarchist actions down everyone else’s throat but conveniently ignore the most critical and fundamental source of crisis, that of the accellerating "human population explosion”.
That clarified, I will be happy to hear your suggestions to resolve this "Real Issue".