The Forum > Article Comments > Clean transport fuels for Australia > Comments
Clean transport fuels for Australia : Comments
By Mike Clarke, published 29/12/2005Mike Clarke argues Australia must develop alternative liquid fuel resources based on its plentiful solid fossil fuel reserves.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
-
- All
Posted by Taz, Friday, 13 January 2006 7:32:33 PM
| |
Mike: Can we look deeper? From a METTS Doc. Bushfire, Storms and Soil Erosion - “The optimal situation is to schedule controlled burning during periods of light rain, with minimal disturbance of decomposing leaf-litter and cryptogams”.
http://www.metts.com.au/bushfire-storms-soil.html Wild fire is my major concern today. Can we say a bushfire behaves like a furnace on the run? Also; to stop it must we eliminate the fine fuel? Thanks for your feedback Posted by Taz, Friday, 13 January 2006 8:05:46 PM
| |
"Peakro asks why, ‘No words on global climate change Mike?’. Well overall I am a Greenhouse sceptic or as some would put it, a ‘denialist’!"
Well, what a surprise that an engineer, who will probably profit from the continuation of fossil fuel exploitation, is a Greenhouse sceptic. Posted by peakro, Wednesday, 18 January 2006 3:30:38 PM
|
“I however understand that the major Greenhouse gas is water vapour. I am curious to understand how the extensive and on-going deforestation are effecting the planet, and hope that the study of the global climatic effects of deforestation are seriously studied in the future”.
Mike: We need another discussion stream on this matter, water vapour is frequently overlooked in many comments on greenhouse gases.
Let’s have something solid on this one soon.
I am a woods man in all of this