The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Clean transport fuels for Australia > Comments

Clean transport fuels for Australia : Comments

By Mike Clarke, published 29/12/2005

Mike Clarke argues Australia must develop alternative liquid fuel resources based on its plentiful solid fossil fuel reserves.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All
Mike Clarke winds up with an interesting comment-

“I however understand that the major Greenhouse gas is water vapour. I am curious to understand how the extensive and on-going deforestation are effecting the planet, and hope that the study of the global climatic effects of deforestation are seriously studied in the future”.

Mike: We need another discussion stream on this matter, water vapour is frequently overlooked in many comments on greenhouse gases.

Let’s have something solid on this one soon.

I am a woods man in all of this
Posted by Taz, Friday, 13 January 2006 7:32:33 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Mike: Can we look deeper? From a METTS Doc. Bushfire, Storms and Soil Erosion - “The optimal situation is to schedule controlled burning during periods of light rain, with minimal disturbance of decomposing leaf-litter and cryptogams”.

http://www.metts.com.au/bushfire-storms-soil.html

Wild fire is my major concern today. Can we say a bushfire behaves like a furnace on the run? Also; to stop it must we eliminate the fine fuel?

Thanks for your feedback
Posted by Taz, Friday, 13 January 2006 8:05:46 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"Peakro asks why, ‘No words on global climate change Mike?’. Well overall I am a Greenhouse sceptic or as some would put it, a ‘denialist’!"

Well, what a surprise that an engineer, who will probably profit from the continuation of fossil fuel exploitation, is a Greenhouse sceptic.
Posted by peakro, Wednesday, 18 January 2006 3:30:38 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy