The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > A tarnished reputation: prisoners and the vote > Comments

A tarnished reputation: prisoners and the vote : Comments

By Debra Parkes, published 18/11/2005

Debra Parkes argues Australia should allow prisoners voting rights.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. Page 7
  9. All
As a follow up of my 20 November 2005 posting that I was convicted for FAILING TO VOTE on 19 July 2006 the County court of Victoria allowed my appeals, set aside the convictions and struck out the charges.

My case before the Court was that the writs for the (purported) 2001 federal election were defective and so ULTRA VIRES.

My issue was that as the 1915 referendum to give the Commonwealth of Australia legislative powers to make voting compulsory had not been proceeded with therefore there was no constitutional powers to force me to vote in the (purported) 2001 federal election!

I also published on 6-7-2006 my latest book;

INSPECTOR-RIKATIŽ & What is the -Australian way of life- really?
A book on CD on Australians political, religious & other rights
ISBN 0-9751760-2-1

And, this book was also filed as evidence in my case.

The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecution found they had a real opponent they could not defeat!

Obviously the issue is that now that I won my cases, then all people unconstitutionally/illegally fined for FAILING TO VOTE should have their moneys refunded. Also, those who were wrongly convicted and now have a criminal record should have their convictions also set aside. After all, as much as the legislative provisions and the writs were unconstitutional/illegal/defective in my case so would it have been for all other people.

Obviously the Australian Electoral Commission having failed to pursue that John Howard was never validly elected, neither other parliamentarians has proven not at all to be fair dinkum in that regard to ensure proper elections were held!

For those who think John Howard ios more then 10 years Prime Minister, reality is that he was never reelected in 2001 as there was no valid election held! He is therefore the pretender!
Posted by Mr Gerrit H Schorel-Hlavka, Monday, 31 July 2006 11:42:26 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. Page 7
  9. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy