The Forum > Article Comments > Bridging the gap with Indonesia > Comments
Bridging the gap with Indonesia : Comments
By Chris Devir, published 4/8/2005Chris Devir argues Australia risks more attacks from terrorist groups if it fails to address its bad image in Indonesia.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
-
- All
Up until Australia's involvement in East Timor the Jakarta Elite considered Australia as a laughing stock. Fuelled by Keating's policy of appeasement the Suharto regime perceived Canberra as 'wishy washy'. In other words the ALP sacrificed principles and didn't mind what Jakarta did with human rights, military attrocities, and systemic corruption at all levels of trade. Canberra under the ALP desperately wanted to be Asian.
Of course many would argue that Howard involved us in Timor because of oil, and that the Libs are pursuing trade with China whilst sacrificing principles (especially in relation to Taiwan). However what Howard has done is engaged Asia in trade relationships of mutual benefit that only were possible after we gained respect through military engagement in Timor (as well as the Pacific). Boundaries have been set this time around. Afterall appeasement only works if respect is there to begin with!
Finally any ideas that Indonesia has nothing to thank Australia for (and vice versa) are nonsense. Australian unions actively campaigned against Dutch colonialism prior to Indonesian independence. Additionally Australia's involvement in Borneo in effect thwarted communism under Sukarno.