The Forum > Article Comments > The anatomy of a suicide bomber > Comments
The anatomy of a suicide bomber : Comments
By Keith Suter, published 25/7/2005Keith Suter explains the logic behind suicide terrorism.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Maybe some still believe in the publication of evidence that has been collected and assessed, but in a world in which half truths, partial truths, the use of different contextual settings to belie the truth, his will draw much obscurantism and special pleading.
Why?
Well it sinks without trace the idea quoted by the trinity that there is a big Islamic bogy man out to either take our freedoms or set up a world wide Caliphate, using terrorism as the method for achieving this aim. Here set out is evidence that suicide attacks, responsible for most deaths, which in turn command the most attention are by secular groups. Sure there are some Islamic groups wishing for a caliphate, see Islam and the West By Akbarzadeh and Yasmeen UNSW press, just as there are some groups within the Christian Church wishing for the Apocalypse, but in the main, at present, Islam is rational and moderate. (Becoming less so?)
Much of the political stance of the coalition (and of the willing part, how similar they are, same text?) is based, justified by such a belief. The diminution of our freedoms ostensibly to protect us (or is it to get a minister off the hook should an attack occur?) and increase of engendered fear going together.
Some of what the Professor claims can be checked at www.tkb.org as can Howard’s claim of terrorism before Iraq, one or two, it is unclear.