The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > A pat on the back is better than a kick in the behind > Comments

A pat on the back is better than a kick in the behind : Comments

By Andrew Leigh, published 20/7/2005

Andrew Leigh argues the states have the money to lure people back to work.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All
Definately sounds like an approach worth trying. I'd love to hear what the governments objection to this approach is.
Posted by bozzie, Wednesday, 20 July 2005 10:25:10 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The states and the Commonwealth have this exorbitant "never-never tax" or the GST. They are all swimming in cash, suddenly neither can afford to look after it's citizens. I have paid taxes for decades, no super in those days. Now I find after assisting to make this nation prosperous I must exist on the aged pension of about just $200 a week.I know a lot of today's workers would contemptuously say that I am a bludger and do not even deserve the miserable $200 a week.I get hungry, need clothes, petrol and other necessities - just like the younger people. When I was a tax payer I readily and willingly paid knowing that some of this tax money would be used to educate those who became today's workers. Now these same workers that I helped do not know and/or do not care about aged pensioners and others who need help. Funny old world eh? numbat
Posted by numbat, Wednesday, 20 July 2005 10:55:28 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Numbat I don't receive one cent from the govt. Our family pays more than $40,000 a year direct tax and then there is the GST, Fuel, Council Rates, mortgage repayments and then there is the hidden taxes that companies pass on to consumers when deciding on prices. Most of our earnings finds its way back to the government. I reckon about 2/3rds of our pay end up back in the government coffers or mailed back to us as propaganda and "conspicuously compassionate" fridge magnets. My family and friends don't begrudge for one second our taxes (actually you have already paid your way) going to assist the less well off. You also need to consider that the $200.00 a week that you have earned for your retirement is going straight back into the economy and most of it will end up in the tax pool; in the portfolios of share holders who do very little to earn their dividends (I don't begrudge people who invest shares but if we are going label those on welfare and pensioners as bludgers then it is only fair to remind those with disposable income to invest that they are mostly earning their income off the backs of employees) and it also ends up in the pockets of wage earners and business (most of which goes back to the government). Get my drift. I think the real bludgers are the government. All that income yet our infrastructure is lagging, dams haven't been built, hospital waiting lists as long as Grandma's yarns, Department of Public Prosecutions can't afford to support its own officers, homelessness, can't (won't) pay a proper pension to the elderly. Andrew Leigh the ideas you propose are great but once again it will only increase the turn over of workers and further skew the unemployment figures. We must also put taxes back into productive things like nation building and create fair working conditions and the jobs and motivation will follow.
Posted by rancitas, Thursday, 21 July 2005 10:37:06 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy