The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > The scandal of Christianity > Comments

The scandal of Christianity : Comments

By Peter Sellick, published 22/6/2005

Peter Sellick argues that the critics of Christianity get it wrong.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 17
  7. 18
  8. 19
  9. Page 20
  10. 21
  11. All
Thank you JRM Aslan, Philo, or the other regular posters should have pulled hime up on this by now.

We are waiting for your reply Sells.

BTW the crowd who say faith and science are outside of each others areas and so cannot comment on either, are ignoring the fact that the supernatural or Divine in the case of Christianity intrudes into the physical world -we are not talking about a Deist God- so it is open to scientific investigation.

The Alchemist please pop over to Margo's Blog http://webdiary.smh.com.au/archives/phil_uebergang/001242.html
it would be handy to have someone who can back me up if they start throwing Biblical passages at me.
Posted by Neohuman, Tuesday, 12 July 2005 10:21:26 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The relationship between history and myth, I would prefer ‘Legend” has been a thorny one since natural science has confirmed the material nature of the world. As I have tried to point out, scripture is a mix of pure legend written in an historical context and interpreted history. In a prescientific culture it was easy to postulate supernatural interpretations on historical events. A similar process occurs in our day when we Australians look back to the events at Galipoli and talk about the birth of the nation. The historians will recount no such birth, they will only recount slaughter and mismanagement. Likewise if we had historical documentation of the escape from Egypt we would not see the sea parting Cecil B De Mill fashion. The historical basis of the story may be that the wheels of the Egyptian chariots got stuck in the mud but when the nation recalled the event it became more and more embellished. There are actually two accounts that have been cut and pasted into the scriptural account, one with naturalistic explanations like the sea being driven back by a strong wind and the other account that describes the sea standing in walls.

The biblical scholars I know do not believe that God intrudes into the physical world making a mess of science. However God does act in history in a similar way that the myth of national formation acts in history or the idea of communism acts in history. The statement that “God raised Jesus Christ from the dead” need not mean and indeed the scripture denies this interpretation, that he was bodily resuscitated. For example, one meaning is that he was vindicated, that he was not in fact judged on the cross but those who put him there were. Paul interprets cross and resurrection in terms of a victory over the “elemental spirits of the universe”, those powers abroad even in our day that dehumanise
Posted by Sells, Wednesday, 13 July 2005 11:35:31 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Any belief that relies on the existence of nature miracles is on shaky ground. All sorts of questions arise. Firstly we must posit a world “back then” different from the one we experience in which such miracles do not happen. Secondly, what does belief in nature miracles point to? Such belief may point to an alternative understanding of the nature of the world in which natural law may be put aside, a very questionable proposition, but they do not point to the corpus of Christian teaching about the event of Jesus. They do not point to the victory over the elemental spirits of the universe, and the overcoming of the law of sin and death. To base faith on the occurrence of nature miracles just makes us superstitious, we might as well believe in alien abduction.

In John’s gospel Jesus sees that some followed because they believed in the signs that he performed and he did not trust himself to them
Posted by Sells, Wednesday, 13 July 2005 12:22:24 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"Flatter me, and I may not believe you.
Criticize me, and I may not like you.
Ignore me, and I may not forgive you.
Encourage me, and I may not forget you."
- William Arthur

This quote is for er.. umm whatsisname?
Posted by Trinity, Wednesday, 13 July 2005 12:39:20 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Sells,
God is all powerful? God created all? IF these are right then…

God chooses the method and style of his miracles. God may OR may not intrude on the physical world (i.e. He may conform to the physics of this universe or not).

Where then in the problem with the beliefs of the Christian faith?

Sorry, I may be a cuckoo or ignorant but I don’t see the point of your argument any more.
Posted by JustDan, Thursday, 14 July 2005 12:01:07 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Just Dan
My point is that the philosophical attributes of God do not apply to the God Christians worship. When you say god is all powerful what do you mean? For Christianity the power of God is hidden in weakness, God reigns from the cross the position of absolute weakness. We need to stop reading the philosophers whose god is a mere projection of human ideas and listen to scripture. This is the scandal that is the original idea of this article.
Posted by Sells, Thursday, 14 July 2005 12:35:41 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 17
  7. 18
  8. 19
  9. Page 20
  10. 21
  11. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy