The Forum > Article Comments > The abortion debate: what a fizzer! > Comments
The abortion debate: what a fizzer! : Comments
By Helen Pringle, published 11/3/2005Helen Pringle argues that on the basis of recent history the abortion debate won't result in any change.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Page 26
-
- All
I am in agreement with this. Abortion has little to do with the “best interests of the child”, as the child is killed. If born the child could be handed over to the father for full custody, or adopted out (and there is a huge waiting list of childless couples).
It is all about the woman. The woman wants the child killed so that it is out of her life as much as possible, so she can avoid responsibility (NB. most women who have abortions are not teenage women) It is about giving a woman “choice” of “responsibility”. If she wants no responsibility, then she can kill the child and no questions are asked.
Of course the father has no such choice of responsibility.
It is also noticeable how the strongest supporters of abortion on demand “for the woman”, also make the most maligning comments about others, but refuse to substantiate those comments. Again avoidance of responsibility.
It is also noticeable how the strongest supporters of abortion on demand “for the woman”, also refuse to answer questions that are asked of them. Again avoidance of responsibility.
It is also noticeable how the strongest supporters of abortion on demand “for the woman”, also seem to want no more information to be gathered regards abortion, or no more research undertaken, or only limited research undertaken. Again avoidance of responsibility.