The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > The abortion debate: what a fizzer! > Comments

The abortion debate: what a fizzer! : Comments

By Helen Pringle, published 11/3/2005

Helen Pringle argues that on the basis of recent history the abortion debate won't result in any change.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 23
  7. 24
  8. 25
  9. Page 26
  10. All
Seeker,
I am in agreement with this. Abortion has little to do with the “best interests of the child”, as the child is killed. If born the child could be handed over to the father for full custody, or adopted out (and there is a huge waiting list of childless couples).

It is all about the woman. The woman wants the child killed so that it is out of her life as much as possible, so she can avoid responsibility (NB. most women who have abortions are not teenage women) It is about giving a woman “choice” of “responsibility”. If she wants no responsibility, then she can kill the child and no questions are asked.

Of course the father has no such choice of responsibility.

It is also noticeable how the strongest supporters of abortion on demand “for the woman”, also make the most maligning comments about others, but refuse to substantiate those comments. Again avoidance of responsibility.

It is also noticeable how the strongest supporters of abortion on demand “for the woman”, also refuse to answer questions that are asked of them. Again avoidance of responsibility.

It is also noticeable how the strongest supporters of abortion on demand “for the woman”, also seem to want no more information to be gathered regards abortion, or no more research undertaken, or only limited research undertaken. Again avoidance of responsibility.
Posted by Timkins, Tuesday, 29 March 2005 9:20:52 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Are we not so over this one! The last comments by Timkins and Andyman just say it all. In the fifties, if we got preggers it was tough cookies if we were stuck with a baby. If we had a shotgun marriage we had "trapped him". No win. Most of the time (seeings how we are now a collective damnation of What Women Do When They Find out They Are Pregnant?!) you guys just took off or didn't pay. Now women have the (and getting to the CRUX of the issue,) safe and legal right to an abortion and you guys are all bitching about child care, access and maintenance. Which, by the by, has nothing to do with abortion. The flavour seems to be that you just can't stand the fact that women now have the call over a very important issue after millenium of having no choice or control. The very thing you guys are bitching about. Choice and control. To do that on this issue, you will need a uterus.
Posted by Di, Sunday, 3 April 2005 7:53:30 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 23
  7. 24
  8. 25
  9. Page 26
  10. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy