Col,
do a searchon CEC... it would be most illuminating.
http://www.cecaust.com.au/

They are hooked up with some Lyndon Larouche bloke from USA who is a "prophet" of economic doom. They also claim the Royal Family is well into and behind the major drug trade of the world. Nothing outlandish mind u :) But from the AIJAC "Australia Israel Jewish Affiars Council" point of view, they are bunch of anti semitic ratbags, who never have anything good to say about zionism or Jews.
I rang one of the CEC people one time to get some background.

I'm quite happy to be verbally hung drawn and quartered by Muslims, Jews or Atheists, but I am rather partial to accuracy. The last time people spread inaccurate stories about the 'evil cult of Christians' was around the Roman era where we were fed to hungry animals for supper. (we were supposed to eat children and babies and drink their blood etc)

The only type of 'viewpoint' I object to being allowed to be proclaimed publically is any call to insurrection or armed rebellion.

Congratulations Mark. Well sed fellas in ur support for MARK. Lets all PRAY 4 Kenny, that he'll accept the LORD as his Saviour. I think Judge Higgins should be in that petition 2. Blessings. FAIRGO.

Amen Brudda :)

BOAZ_David "The only type of 'viewpoint' I object to being allowed to be proclaimed publically is any call to insurrection or armed rebellion. "

Exactly - the point at which a "crime" is committed should be at the moment of incitement to violence or criminal action - not "vilification".
For "civil" issues - the laws of libel and slander are available.

Seems that Justice Higgins has shown just how ignorant and prejudiced a judge can be. But then again these seem to be common criticisms of many of the judges. There are so many people (including legal professionals) who distrust our legal system that one wonders how much longer this can go on.

Perhaps it's time these judges got re-educated.

In a country such as the one we live in, it would be expected that a person would be able to say what they like to whomever they like, without the fear of imprisonment. But is this so anymore? Has our freedom of speech been withdrawn, by the very government that has sworn to uphold our constitutional rights? It appears so! how can the government pass a law that would let a judge who obviously has no religious background of any sort, decide what is the truth? more importantly how can we as citizens stand by and let this happen?