The “ordinary voters” had the chance to do something about immigration at two elections. They did nothing. They even increased Albanese's seats the second time. The “ordinary voters” are either stupid or suicidal. They should not be forced to vote because they don't understand - or care - about democracy or the tyranny of compulsory voting.

Albanese still has two years to continue to replace the locals with immigrants, and my money is on the “ordinary voters” rewarding him again.

The ‘Bondi Commission’? A mob for Palestinians has gatecrashed that, and turned it into a rant against Israeli, when it was supposed to be about antisemitism in Australia and Australian Jews. Albanese's pet Commissioner is OK with that.

She is 75 years old, by the way. Even judges have to retire at 70.

Of course Albanese and the MSM lie about immigration; lying is their modus operandi.

Australians are being “sledged” because their apathy and ignorance invites it.

Unless Australian voters start taking an interest in politics, remember or learn that democracy is for the people and by the people, they will always have to take crap from the dictators they keep electing.

Ttbn:

Who actually is an Australian, is the correct question in response to your frustration with the voters?

Historically, Australian culture was shaped predominantly by the British colonial settlement and its Anglo-Celtic institutions, traditions, language, and legal system. Over recent decades, however, Australia has become far more ethnically and culturally diverse through sustained immigration.

Governments frequently refer to everyone who holds Australian citizenship or permanent residence as “Australians.” That is a legal and civic definition. #Whether it also reflects a shared cultural identity is a different question, and one that many believe deserves more open discussion#.

The growth of parties such as One Nation has been driven, in part, by voters who feel that Australia’s traditional cultural identity is being weakened and that the major parties have ignored or dismissed their concerns about immigration, national identity, and social cohesion.

Whether one agrees with that view or not, it reflects a genuine political sentiment among a segment of the electorate. Dismissing those concerns as prejudice rather than engaging with them has arguably contributed to increasing political polarization.

The challenge for Australia is to decide whether national identity is primarily a legal status, a shared civic commitment, a cultural inheritance, or some combination of these. That debate should be conducted honestly

Not "frustration". Contempt and a complete lack of sympathy for the whingers who are getting what they voted for.

In the latest Ipsos poll, the cost of living is the standout issue at 65% with Australians, followed by Housing 42%, The Economy 26%, Immigration 24%, Crime 23&.

Polling also shows that the ALP remains the party seen as most capable of managing the leading issues, including Cost of Living, Housing, the Economy, Crime, and Healthcare. The claim by the political extreme in society that immigration is the number one issue, is not true. Australia has under both Labor and Coalition governments managed a controlled immigration policy, with 70% of migrants being granted entry under the skilled migration program.

Did you even check the article and citations Paul or just look in the mirror like Mean Albo?

It is referenced that voters-who-aren't-Paul want much lower migration. It's referenced that Albo immigration is much higher than ever before, and much much higher than comparable nations. Hardly "controlled migration".

It is quite true that 70% of Permanent Migration visas are Skill Stream. But only about half of these - about 60K - are principals not family, and relatively few of these are in high paid occupations in strong demand. When you compare this to Net Migration of 300K, it's a joke, about 10%. The biggest slice of our net migration is Students, not Skill Stream

As for skills, an Indian doctor driving a taxi in Australia earns twice what he would as an average doctor in India. It can take over two years for him to meet requirements to practice medicine in Australia.

Skilled migration is bollocks, to put it mildly. Just because migrants can satisfy the skills requirements to get into the country doesn't mean that they are going to use their skills here.

Any old job, plus the benefits when they achieve citizenship, is far better in Australia than in India. They can live much better, and even send money back to the family at home: which is much cheaper than getting them out here.

Meanwhile, the 'reduction' in immigration claimed, which is really an increase in immigration, has caused havoc in the caucus, leaving Tony
Burke looking an even bigger fool than he has looked in the past.

In a democracy, governments are supposed to seek the consent of the people. That’s not happening in Australia. The obvious evidence of this multiculturalism and mass immigration. There is no way this arrogant undemocratic nonsense would be agreed to if put to a vote. That’s why there has never been a vote on either. The political class knows it doesn't do well in referendums.

There are around 18 million Australian voters, only 226 federal politicians, and about 365 thousand federal bureaucrats, few of them powerful or influential.

Only about 10% of voters express dissent to politicians, by letter, phone, or email or face-to-face. Just voting against one side of the uniparty to ‘teach one side a lesson’ won't make any difference because both sides are guilty of pushing multiculturalism and mass immigration. One Nation says it will put a stop to both things, but … I don't see them getting enough seats to make much difference; the Coalition is as critical of them as Labor is. It was forecast that the uniparty would gang up on One Nation, and that is now a reality. Taylor has made it clear that he would prefer to be Opposition leader than form a government with One Nation.

Australia used to be exceptional; now it is barely mediocre, and getting worse. And 18 million voters don't seem to care. The kids not old enough to vote yet are brain-washed to the point of uselessness.

I reckon that generations after my own will see Australia slide much further:- mediocre > poor > inferior > abysmal > kaput.

Hi Steve S,

I see your article is laced with plenty of anti-Labor vitriol, which leads me to believe you are biased against the government, and how it has managed the migration issue. Post Covid given the circumstance I believe the Coalition would not have acted in anyway differently. If you don't like what the government is doing you are free to campaign and vote for those who align more with your views, a person and a party like Pauline Hanson and One Nation.

"In a democracy, governments are supposed to seek the consent of the people" That's why we have democratic elections, politicians seek a mandate to govern, and on the 3rd May 2025 that's exactly what happened, the people cast their ballets to determine who should be the next government, the majority under our preferential voting system supported the Australian Labor Party. This notion that government should put everything to the people, before enacting legislation is ludicrous nonsense, and would be totally unworkable.

I don't know how old YOU are ttbn, I believe YOU are a octogenarian, a relic from yesteryear. Unfortunately as someone approaching end of life, YOU have a terribly miserable disposition when it comes to the world, Australia, and the majority of people. What a sad old fella YOU are, my advice is cheer up, smell the roses, your end will come soon enough.

I'm not anti Labor, Paul, I'm pro voter, and Albo Labor never ever sought a "mandate" for such extraordinary levels of immigration.

In US, UK, Canada, Denmark, NZ, etc, mainstream parties (left or right) have responded to the popular will, and slashed immigration. But here, LibLabGreenTeal just circle the wagons, and point at Bad Old Pauline.

“They have already brought in 1.5m in 4y. That’s why your rent exploded, your pay went backwards, your kids can’t afford a home. It’s why hospitals are turning away sick people.” Hanson is the only one saying it out loud. In a so called "democracy" surely that is healthy.

Hi Steve S,

You can blame all of the economic and social problems on migrants, if you like, they're easy to scapegoat. The reality is economic and social problems are not all caused by migration; they arise from a complex mix of domestic policies, global economic shifts, and local infrastructure challenges. What you wont say is gross migration peaked in 2023, and has been declining ever since. 2020/21 saw a gross migration loss of -85,000, plus 500,000 temporary visa holders leaving Australia due to Covid, resulting in a severe skills shortage.
What I do say, is migration does need to be carefully controlled and managed, and skilled migrants are a valuable asset, you seem to lumps all migrants together in one overgrown figure. Your 1.5 million is out by 100,000 to 200,000,ABS but it sounds good.

Given your anti-migrant bias, I can see why you are attracted to the poplularism of Hanson, and One Nation. There is nothing new in extremists scapegoating minorities, by pushing the politics of grievance. In Australia, gays have too many rights, Aboriginals get it too good, Muslims are out to kill us, migrants are taking advantage of us, the list goes on and on. Its all about them and us, us being the good righteous majority, and them being the bad minorities, who want to take down the good, very simple.

A question for you, if every migrant working in the construction industry was to leave today, what would be the result?