Yuck! I'm glad that I am an old man married to an old woman.

Women are designed to be Lesbians !

It takes men a long time for this reality to settle!

Marriage used to be for building something together rather than winning a lottery. Men are just giving women what they asked for, and they still don't like it.

- Be careful what you wish for.
- If you don't know what you want you'll never get it.
- Because women didn't believe in anything, they fell for everything.
- Hegel said- the mind is free and reality is a prison.

"Women are designed to be Lesbians!" Interesting conjecture Diver Dan.

With tens of thousands of years of history and the present day 7 billion+ global population, that's a big statement. If your conjecture is correct, the feminists must be right about all hetero sex being rape.

So that means that for tens of thousands of Earth years, all men have been porking lesbians without consent. Rape! That's a very big #MeToo. That's a big call. You might be right.

Then again, maybe, just maybe, a few of those women might have invited and enjoyed the sexual attentions of their rapists. Something to think about. Interesting.

voxUnius

Yes, it’s an all too tragic life.

Men must be careful to. The AMF had a strict rule against homosexuals, since, where two or more people are gathered for whatever reason, sex is always an option!

Therefore marriage is a pup!

The motivation for marriage is primarily for uncontested convenient sex: any other outcome is simply coincidental.

It seems that if "Women are designed to be Lesbians!" then "men have invaded their nation" like Marxist's claim about Aboriginals too. Rinse and repeat. But nature has designed both men and women to be complementary specialists- but women seem to have little in the way of complements about men- what does this mean about our civilization. Maybe Marxism is a smokescreen to destroy our civilization. Foreign interactions throughout history have been used to undermine competitors- often brutally. You can't break the laws of nature, only break yourself against them. Once you realise that Feminism is just a flavour of Marxism the rhetoric becomes more understandable. Marxist's also claim that capitalist's steal the publics resources (framing the relationship in a similar way as invading and capturing the territory of the public). Men and women are different, so it stands to reason that women will see sex in a different way to men, but to conflate it with a particular type of Marxist Dialectic seems to be a similar mistake that Plato made when he said that truth is based on abstraction rather than experience.

A classic rookie mistake of solving the problem before understanding it.

But Plato was sort of right, in a sense, once you have a strong foundational experience of a phenomena, you can make abstract generalizations, it is usually a good rule of thumb to follow these abstractions, but zealous fashion is not the same as well founded abstraction. Aristotle on the other hand believed that experience, was the source of truth.

Hegel and then Marx piled on over 2000 years later, in an attempt to synthesize these ideas. But they seem to have made similar errors to Plato and Aristotle.