The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Australia's critical minerals strategy has a missing link > Comments

Australia's critical minerals strategy has a missing link : Comments

By Shaira Husain, published 9/4/2026

Australia’s biggest critical-minerals problem is not geology. It is failing to capture the refining and manufacturing that creates real value.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All
A future power house? Australia is a current s..t house. Whatever minerals there are to mine, the mining itself will be banned by politicians pandering to minorities and myths.
Posted by ttbn, Thursday, 9 April 2026 8:57:11 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Gees youre a miserable old git titibean. Go see your doctor he can give you something. Euthanasia will help you cope I guarantee it.
Posted by mikk, Thursday, 9 April 2026 12:36:34 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
This article does quite a good job of identifying the barriers to processing minerals in Australia, but doesn’t really offer any solutions. Yes, processing is energy-intensive, but without a practical means to reduce energy costs then this will remain a fundamental barrier to a viable processing industry. Yes, investment risk is high, but this reflects economic conditions in the industry. Without a realistic means to reduce market volatility (other than using taxpayers’ money to mitigate foreign multinationals’ investment risks) then this will also remain a fundamental barrier to a viable processing industry. And yes, scale and industry concentration are important, but governments cannot wave a magic wand to transform Kwinana into Guangdong.

Economics alone is unlikely to ever deliver a competitive critical mineral processing industry in Australia. Geo-political considerations might. The world is waking up to the need to have reliable and politically trustworthy sources of economically and strategically important resources. It may be that we, and our potential customers, will be willing to pay a bit more to ensure those needs are met.
Posted by Rhian, Thursday, 9 April 2026 2:06:11 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The author is making an observation well known to anyone involved in downstream processing. Success often or usually depends on proximity to markets. The fashion industry offers a great example. Many Australian business people have ventured into making woolen garments for the world market. They thought that proximity to merino sheep would give them a winning competitive advantage. It didn't and they consistently failed. I was involved in mineral research in CSIRO. We soon learned that with innovative processing technologies brilliance was not enough. We were usually too disconnected from the markets to make an impact. China's domination of global rare earth refining is a classic example. They have the technology and the market. Of course there can be exceptions. Keep looking!
Posted by TomBie, Thursday, 9 April 2026 5:56:30 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy