The Forum > Article Comments > Experiments in futility: Australia’s teenage social media ban approaches > Comments
Experiments in futility: Australia’s teenage social media ban approaches : Comments
By Binoy Kampmark, published 8/12/2025As Australia moves to ban under-16s from major social platforms, teens, regulators and civil libertarians collide in a brewing legal and political battle over digital freedom.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
-
- All
Posted by Fester, Tuesday, 9 December 2025 7:02:32 AM
| |
Hi Yuyutsu,
They said the problem is Tik Tok and X not what they're doing that is the cause of the criticism. In their mind what they're doing is perfectly fine they just don't like their Jewish kids seeing the atrocities the IDF do for themselves. I know you don't watch youtube, but if you did you'd see for yourself. First video is Netanyahu saying Tik Tik and X is the problem, so they just had Jew Larry Ellison buy Tik Tok so they could censor atrocities in Gaza because they are losing support of Jewish and evangelical youth. http://www.youtube.com/shorts/gPKw3cM3DUI http://youtu.be/QYO2ZsQu0H8?t=556 It always seems to be blame with them Blame the Palestinians, blame Tik Tok Blame the ICC, blame anti-semites... Never what they do. Let's talk about Israels use of the word 'terrorist organisation' Israel criminalized group following report of raped Palestinian child https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/tamara-nassar/israel-criminalized-group-following-report-raped-palestinian-child "Israel designated a human rights group as a terrorist organization shortly after the US State Department inquired about a report detailing the rape of a Palestinian child by Israeli prison authorities." So this kid gets raped, and the Palestinian child protection agency try to expose it, the they gets raided and labelled a terrorist organisation. Pretty liberal use of the term right? That's the equivalent of naming the Daniel Morcombe Foundation terrorists... What about 'anyone that criticises Israel for actions in Gaza is labelled an Anti-Semite'. So they may as well throw both of those terms 'Terrorist organisation' and 'anti-semite' in the bin, because they carry little weight given the above examples Posted by Armchair Critic, Wednesday, 10 December 2025 9:12:47 AM
| |
[Cont.]
Israeli Prison guards are accused of rape, Israel attacks the Minister who said it, and hundreds of Jews turn up to demand the release of the rapists, and proclaim that Jews have a right to rape them. The ICC tries to call out Israels genocide, Israel quiety makes threats against the ICC tells them they will destroy them. Francesca Albanese was the most highly publicised person who called out Israels genocide, the U.S. sanctioned her, shut all her bank accounts down, not able to open new ones. Doesn't matter if you really were raping, attack the minister who exposed it, defend the raping, defend the perpetrators and lablen the child protection agency terrorists. Doesn't matter if the ICC lawyer make an fair and unbiased assessment based on merit, you have to attack her and set an example that no criticism goes unpunished. I look at Jewish publications, and it's clear Jews want to identify and vilify anyone that criticises them or threatens their power, (even their own, that call our rapists) just like the NAZI parliament protest that was OK'd by police themselves beforehand, but politicians were embarrassed, Jews were angered so they exposed the bloke, and his girlfriend (make it person) and got him deported, just for saying 'End the Israel Lobby' Identify and vilify http://thejewishindependent.com.au/loopholes-in-victorian-protest-bill Harassed the military lawyer so badly she attempted suicide https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/11/1/why-has-the-israeli-armys-top-lawyer-resigned-after-leaking-rape-evidence http://www.timesofisrael.com/ex-idf-legal-chief-hospitalized-police-ask-court-to-apply-house-arrest-conditions/ And finally just want to say it seems to me large majority of Jews just can't seem to comprehend the legitimate non-Jew criticism factor. ...Like do Jews ever wonder what a non-Jewish people think about this kind of bs? Seems most just think everyone else is the problem, but never what they're doing themselves. Sometimes, people can't see the bigger picture, they can only see things one way, and truly believe others are the problem. They just can't see or grasp that the real problem for the whole entire mess is them, themselves. And that they are the cause, the architect of their whole entire own mess themselves, no matter how much they tell themselves otherwise. Posted by Armchair Critic, Wednesday, 10 December 2025 9:32:36 AM
| |
Articles a few months old now, but interesting nonetheless
Australia Registers New Industry Codes for Online Safety, Expanding Age Assurance Requirements http://idtechwire.com/australia-registers-new-industry-codes-for-online-safety-expanding-age-assurance-requirements/ Posted by Armchair Critic, Wednesday, 10 December 2025 9:33:49 AM
| |
Dear Critic,
I already noted in my previous post that mentioning Jews and Israel is irrelevant to this topic. Yet you insist on remaining off-topic. I don't know nor care what Netanyahu is saying: if he said that the sky is yellow then I would say that the sky is blue and if he said that the sky was blue then I also would say that the sky is blue. If all Israelis said that social-media is bad then I would say that social-media is bad and if they all said that social-media is good then I also would say that social-media is bad. Some people in this forum never stop thinking about England, yet you are the most loyal Israeli I ever met, for no matter the topic of conversation, you never stop thinking about Israel! Posted by Yuyutsu, Wednesday, 10 December 2025 11:17:02 AM
|


No one can say what ideas and individual will form, but isn't it better to teach people to reason and then form their own ideas? Albo's plan seems more about keeping people from what are perceived as bad ideas.
You're a good example of someone forming his own views via unrestricted access to information. That is how it should be.