The Forum > Article Comments > 300 stand in defiance > Comments
300 stand in defiance : Comments
By Michael Viljoen, published 5/9/2025For Melburnians, Day 101 of lockdown was not just about COVID rules — it became a stand against government overreach.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Page 7
- 8
- 9
-
- All


I appreciated your previous post for its more grounded tone and the effort to find areas of agreement - but with this latest one, we’re back to poetic myth-making. Which is fine, if you’re writing folk ballads. But if you’re claiming historical record or political insight, then I’d suggest a little more caution with the metaphors.
We’re now equating a crowd at Flagstaff Gardens to the Spartans at Thermopylae and the Anzacs and the Eureka Stockade, while quoting protest songs about “bullets flying” and “we’ve already won.” I understand symbolism, truly. But symbolism shouldn’t become a substitute for accuracy.
You say 150,000 marched. That number is unverified and heavily disputed. Even the highest credible estimates put it well below that. To compare it to an AFL Grand Final or the Vietnam Moratorium without hard data is simply rhetorical inflation.
As for Sutton’s recent comments, yes, he acknowledged that some measures may not have been necessary. That’s not the same as declaring the pandemic response a mistake or vindicating early protests. Every public health strategy is revised in hindsight, that’s not proof that the protestors “had it right all along.” If you believe a few retrospective regrets = total vindication, then I fear you’re only listening for the notes that flatter your tune.
And finally, no, I don’t “dislike” your article. I disagreed with it. Strongly. But there’s a difference between disagreement and dislike. One is intellectual. The other is emotional. I’m doing my best to stick to the former. I’d ask the same in return.