"The No Nuclear Homeland, that is a value. It's like, if we lose our values, life would lose meaning."

It's a trick.
The West talks about values, but it's all about convincing you to support a position that isn't actually in your best interests, but in the interests of others.

Dementia and self destruction:

The epitome of the Democrat Administration now running a rainbow ideological war of the world, which has no borders; especially none at home in the US.

AC.
You r trying hard to maintain a course of prediction which is commendable, but you’re stuck in third gear.

The future in warfare will be nuclear: Don’t get bogged down on our old concepts of blowing the world apart to claim victory either. The sole purpose of warfare is to claim land mass.
A landmass contaminated with nuclear fallout is unusable for a thousand years is undesirable ; a view commonly shard by a majority of warring nations.

Nuclear development has come a long long way since 1945.
Israel, France and in its heyday South Africa, were jointly developing Nuclear weapons in the early sixties; Israel were particularly keen on small nuclear parcels, the size of an average suitcase.
If I were Iran I’d be very cautious.

More likely to be deployed will be EMF’s., which are large nuclear bombs exploded in space and deployed from satellites.
Russia is currently adapting the technology to a satellite for realistic use: This move is outside all International agreements, however, Putin sees no threat from the toothless U.S. under a Biden Administration, so has progressed the venture gauging no threat to its success.

The EMF is the big bombardment equivalent used in trench warfare of the First World War for example. Everything electrical underneath the explosion will be disabled; it has the ability to be adjusted to a target area the size of a city, to that of a State.

It’s easy to see the advantages of a Chinese EMF weapon exploded over Taiwan as a precursor to an attack. There is virtually no destruction to infrastructure from conventional weapons and the prize for the winner is vast and free almost.

Recall this ABC report on Taiwan's Orchid Island
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-04-09/taiwan---standing-on-shaky-ground/4619352
It showed rusting drums of radioactive material being lapped by waves at the base of a cliff. It also emphasized the frequency of earthquakes no doubt referring to Fukushima. It looks like Japan now has such issues under control so Taiwan could follow their lead.

According to DFAT Australia exports billions of dollars of coal and LNG to Taiwan. I guess other countries can use what we're supposed to be phasing out. That means our conscience is clear according to Albo.

Maybe being on the Ring of Fire and being unable to store their radioactive material sensibly are reasons why expanding nuclear requires more careful consideration.

Hi Diver Dan,

"More likely to be deployed will be EMF’s., which are large nuclear bombs exploded in space and deployed from satellites.
Russia is currently adapting the technology to a satellite for realistic use: This move is outside all International agreements, however, Putin sees no threat from the toothless U.S. under a Biden Administration, so has progressed the venture gauging no threat to its success."

I've heard it mentioned that Israel may use a neutron bomb on Lebanon.
Right now, what is really serious is the IMF nuclear treaty, which lapsed, and both sides are developing new weapons.

The world needs new nuclear treaties, we're in dangerous territory right now.
http://www.youtube.com/live/DsunsdANL5c?t=338

#I've heard it mentioned that Israel may use a neutron bomb on Lebanon#

What do we see here in reality, towards predicting the future of the war on all fronts that is Israel?

We observe a tacit following of orders by Israel directed from the US:
Israel is decidedly weakened by the U.S. Alliance, and is locked in to a grim future because of it.

Ritters arguing against the use of nuclear weapons is entirely built on the moral argument.
What he fails to mention, is that wars involving major powers are fought using proxy powers; Iran , Nuclear armed almost, and within two years expected to make decisive moves against Israel . It’s easy to see the moral argument against the use of nuclear weapons falls flat with the mention of a nuclear armed Iran.

If Israel were unified politically, which it is not, a preemptive strike against Irans nuclear facilities would achieve long term aims for Israel’s security.
Israel lacks the necessary will to use Nuclear weapons for the purpose.

A great win for their strong rainbow culture it seems. 20% leftists in high places, wins against 80% of the plonkers on the right. That’s interesting for us on the sidelines to note!

That point needs to be debated.