The Forum > Article Comments > Where are our climate and weather scientists? > Comments
Where are our climate and weather scientists? : Comments
By Terry Ryan, published 12/10/2022A massive volcano erupts in the Pacific Ocean and no one factors it into the weather despite the record of volcanoes of smaller size doing this in the past.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
-
- All
Posted by Armchair Critic, Wednesday, 12 October 2022 5:08:06 PM
| |
Where are our climate and weather scientists?
probably on holiday in Hawaii on their generous public-funded Superannuations ! Posted by Indyvidual, Wednesday, 12 October 2022 6:33:51 PM
| |
Barmaid:
Why the big eruption? Says volcano: That’s not an eruption, I’m just pleased to see the rain! Dan Posted by diver dan, Wednesday, 12 October 2022 7:57:58 PM
| |
>I'll stick with qualified people who know what they are talking about
Fine words, ttbn when we look at what else you've posted on the subject, it's obvious they're a pack of lies! You prefer to stick with the misinformation the Murdoch Press spews out. You don't even listen to the qualified people who know what they're talking about, because you consider their predictions (which you haven't actually read) to be alarmist. In reality the scientists knew in the early '90s that the problem was serious but the timescale was much longer than the alarmists were claiming. But that wasn't very widely reported because it wasn't sensational enough to sell newspapers. Those pushing their own agendas could shout much louder. >...not carpet-baggers and anonymous drongo posters Quite ironic considering I post using my real name, while you use a pseudonym that seems ill suited to your personality. >...who get all their information from Google. Google's a very useful tool for finding information. I suggest you try it sometime - you might actually learn something. And rest assured, it's not the only way I find information. But more importantly, I've explained something you didn't know. You've reacted in the wilfully ignorant way of denying it because you dislike the source. Whereas the sensible way would be to investigate what I'm saying. Try to prove it wrong if you like, but don't pretend you don't now know why the 3% is more significant than the 97%. Posted by Aidan, Friday, 14 October 2022 8:54:10 PM
| |
What we have today is academic hacks who are happy to sell their soul for a new grant, & a few idiots who actually believe the scam
You are not wrong about that, Hasbeen. Back in 2007........ http://www.heraldsun.com.au/blogs/andrew-bolt/tim-flannerys-latest-prediction-blown-away/news-story/c5837775b57d24ee731f9e67b8b7a017 Posted by JF Aus, Monday, 17 October 2022 8:35:18 PM
|
Hopefully thrown into the volcano as a sacrifice to appease the climate gods.
- It's about as good of a worthwhile contribution as they will ever make.