The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > “Recalibrating” censorship in Australia > Comments

“Recalibrating” censorship in Australia : Comments

By Laurence Maher, published 18/8/2022

The commissioner of the world's first regulatory authority for online harms wants more censorship legislation.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All
We're always told to look to the future because what's done is done yet when it comes in handy the past or rather the bad parts of the past come in very handy for those who profited from it !
Posted by Indyvidual, Friday, 19 August 2022 1:11:21 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Very well researched and referenced article.

"We penetrate the Cabinets"

- I've told others about Klaus Schwab's boasting that he holds great influence over our governments, and I have questioned what democracy we actually have as sovereign citizens if all the decisions are made by people outside our country.

Klaus's father Eugen Schwab worked for Escher Wyss and Cie, a leading NAZI contractor in WWII that made turbines.

Some interesting reading...
http://georgewebb.substack.com/p/saving-private-farben
Posted by Armchair Critic, Friday, 19 August 2022 2:44:11 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
[Cont.]
Also, I think its more about regulation, oversight, political censorship and defunding and deplatforming speech that doesn't support their narratives as much as it's about 'protecting kids from harm'.
They always dress these things up as being in the interests of inclusion and citizens best interests but really its about control of information.

Just today I came across 2 videos, where they are trying to shut down the speech of content creators in relation to narratives they don't like.

Jackson Hinkle
http://youtu.be/yktoPUNHi08

Jimmy Dore
(videos contain swearing)
http://youtu.be/dzGfzb7V2Mg
http://youtu.be/zM5K2W9ZvAc

Rumble V's YouTube lawsuit.
http://rumble.com/

Rumble is a free speech YouTube alternative platform, which has risen in popularity because YouTube routinely demonetises and closes the accounts of content creators that don't follow the official narratives.
People who have their accounts closed (and lose all their uploaded content) have little recourse to argue the point as YouTube does not give specific reasons for claimed infringements of its policies.

Rumble has taken YouTube's parent company Google to court as YouTube holds a market monopoly and Google does not show Rumble in it's search results.
http://www.businessinsider.com/rumble-sues-google-youtube-conservatives-2021-1
Posted by Armchair Critic, Saturday, 20 August 2022 12:19:40 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy