The Forum > Article Comments > Is a serious debate on our approach to regional security possible? > Comments
Is a serious debate on our approach to regional security possible? : Comments
By Jeffrey Wall, published 14/4/2022For too long it has suited the convenience of both major parties to adopt a
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
-
- All
There is a plethora of evidence proving the consequences of how we should not trust the US alliance to serve our needs effectively.
I viewed your video link without any surprises; but I do not support a full suck up to China as your video proposes, but a very much different attachment and expectation than now towards the US, for help on the issue of Chinese encroachment.
Comments by Trump in his early days in the White House, should have rung alarm bells to wake Australia to the need to be more independent of any anticipated support from them.
Their assistance in the Pacific during WW11 was begrudging, belated and problematic, albeit ultimately successful, more as luck would have it.
Anybody with half a brain can see at a glance, they definitely can’t be trusted: Follow the history of Israel for evidence of their unreliability and at times, treachery. That’ll be our lot!
The inevitability is China is moving into the South East Asia and the South Pacific.
The time has passed for any serious military reaction to that move.
We’ve been done cold on the issue.
As your video rightly points out, the chances of Australia becoming a sacrificial lamb by the US, which results in a wipe out, as did Ukraine under their naive trust of US meddling, goes without need for comment.
Dan.