The climate scam and wild panic is unlikely to change in my lifetime, so - no comment.

There is obviously a deeper question to the climate panic we are forced to live through.
The question is, who are the “we” in the losing camp, and who are the “they” in the ruling camp?

As this article aptly points out, it’s not a question of right and wrong, but winner and loser. The facts are simply the same ammunition used on both sides.

The intransigence of the winners is the obstacle to be overcome.

Identify exactly what is the demographic of the winning team, and discredit them at their own weak points. Tactics.

Dan

Viv. Why do some intellectually challenged folk/coal-fired advocates always equate decarbing the economy with tanking it!?

Especially when the very opposite is more than possible, but able to turbocharge an economy on steroids with the right policy settings!

And those policy settings are these. We need to become a nuclear-powered and nuclear-armed economy!

We need to embrace cooperative capitalism the way a drowning man clutches a straw!

And jettison the current highly convoluted and complicated tax system in favour of an unavoidable flat tax set at 15% above a very generous tax-free threshold!

None of the above can be cherry-picked, but must be seen as part and parcel of decarbing the economy without tanking it! But indeed, the very opposite!

People who understand economics, know that some known resources, i.e., coal, are more valuable if left underground, as opposed to mining, then dumping them on an oversupplied market!

Viv, you've made the same asinine claims before without any evidence or proof! Just the same (buried head) BS regurgitated time and again!

Time to put this broken record C.R.A.P., to bed, Viv and focus on sensible and viable solutions that do no economic harm but help the economy enormously! And indeed the monumental debt burden!

READ, LOOK AND LEARN!

Sir Richard Branston tells this story. One day he invited a highly placed person who was a part of the flat earth society, to a trip on his low orbit spacecraft. And the invitation accepted, the passenger sat glued to the porthole as a round earth revealed itself to his very eyes!

Upon landing, Sir Richard enquired, what do you think now? Whereupon and I paraphrase, the passenger replied The special effects were almost believable as were the quite brilliant graphics!

Viv, you and your climate change denialist cohort are the climate change denialists versions of that flat-earher, able to simply ignore the plain as the nose on your face, evidence and keep on spouting the same fact-free, demented dribble
Alan B.

Interesting article. BTW, you know the old saying that gets poo pooed
by the global warming fanatics,
What happens when the wind doesn't blow and the sun doesn't shine ?
Well they found out in Britain, the lights go out !
The wind turbines all stood still for a few days.
They had fire in the terminal from the French nuclear stations.
They had to start up a couple of old coal fired stations that had not
been blown up.

Of course Australia is a lot bigger than Britain, so we would probably
get some wind somewhere, perhaps from near Broome and the power could
come to Sydney & Melbourne. That would mean a lot of money spent on
the grid itself. No one said it will not cost a lot of money.
It is just can you afford to buy that power ?

As a regular user, I don't think the weather has much of an impact on my lifestyle. I spend most of my time sitting at my PC and playing casino games. Freespins and bonuses are very addictive to the game, time flies fast with it.
Although the idea of energy is very interesting!