The Forum > Article Comments > Effective public health measures are coercive > Comments
Effective public health measures are coercive : Comments
By Peter Baume, published 24/8/2021They limit personal autonomy but protect third parties. The justification for what is done rests on the ethical principle of consequentialism.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
-
- All
Yes, it is acceptable (though not honourable) to coerce others in self-defense, but never beyond that: coercion must be limited only to that which is truly essential for preventing the coerced from causing harm to others.
Coercion may never be used in order to:
1) "protect" those who do not wish to be protected, or against things they do not wish to be protected from.
2) generate comforts and benefits.
3) try to gain appreciation, status, name or fame.
The examples of seat-belts, iodide in flour and fluorine in water go well over and beyond what is reasonably moral.
"Baume was appointed an Officer of the Order of Australia in January 1992 in recognition of service to the Australian Parliament"
Well knowing who the authors' patrons are, who he serves, explains it all, the author being a politician, neither a philosopher nor one who cares for morality.