Jonathan J. Ariel, if the vaccines are of any use they will protect the vaccinated, & the un-vaccinated can not harm you. As it is proven the vaccinated can still acquire the virus, & spread it, so if anything the probable more careless behavior of the vaccinated is more likely to be endangering the health of the un-vaccinated.

Thank you for the follow up post Anthony. I'm afraid I am still not convinced. I would be much more likely to be convinced if the government had not made it very difficult to acquire Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin or other antiviral alternate treatments.

In the belief that there can be no smoke without some fire, there is too much evidence of the usefulness of these treatments for them not to advantageous to some extent. Having taken both the above as a prophylactic for malaria in the islands for some years over 40 years ago, I know they are safe.

I have now gained access to Ivermectin, & will take it in conjunction with C, D & zinc in the old malaria dose, with larger dose available if required.

Having taken this action, the authorities have totally lost my confidence, & I will not consider any of these vaccines this side of 2026.

Anthony Bishop

"Given I posted, I should address the list of concerns one reader had."

It seems I should be grateful. So I am. And BTW, I do have a name.

Well, your replies might reassure others, but they certainly don't convince me as to the long term safety of these injections. I've read from a number of well-respected health professionals who are seriously concerned about these experimental gene therapies and the risk of longterm health problems such as heart issues, autoimmune disease, fertility problems and cancer.

Your mobile phone analogy is very apt. It's the reason I've never owned one. And just as brain surgeon, Charlie Teo's warnings on mobile phones and brain tumours have been shut down by Big Telco, so too will any future warnings on links between mRNA gene therapy and emerging health problems be shut down by Big Pharma.

Regarding the placebo group, it states in the study you linked to that this group will be offered the injection "at defined points as part of the study." This is exactly what has already happened, despite there being several years of the studies yet to run. Both Moderna and Pfizer controls have now been given mRNA shots. There is no longer a placebo group. The tests are a sham.

As for the Pfizer boss, he definitely hadn't had a shot at the time of the December 2020 interview you linked to, despite telling everyone else to get one as soon as possible! Obviously, the media were onto him and he couldn't continue to delay. So yes, I do concede I didn't have that bit of trivia completely right!

Bronwyn

“A view from nowhere”

Or

A view of Cuba from Guantanamo Bay.

Dan

Dear Anthony,

«In the next 12-months, each of you will be exposed to covid as we go from pandemic to endemic (flu is endemic for example). The only question you need to ask is would I rather get exposed to covid vaccinated or unvaccinated. That is the basis of the risk analysis.»

Not quite: the question should be, would I rather get exposed to covid vaccinated with the best possible vaccine or with a mediocre one.

Since in Australia those who received AstraZeneca will be prevented from also receiving Pfizer/Moderna further down the line, at least before borders are opened, accepting AstraZeneca is a very poor choice, not only due to blood-clotting.

If it was up to me alone, then I would buy ALL the vaccines, whether or not approved by the Australian bureaucracy, and inject them myself into my arm, every month a different one as this would secure me the best possible immunity.

Dear Hasbeen,

A quick look at your history shows this was you take on vaccines about 10 years ago:

"I agree that vaccination is a very good thing for the vast majority, & the small risk of harm to any individual is a risk worth taking".

I can think of no reason why that would change other than it now conforms to your political ideology to be vaccine hesitant.

To think that you now have fallen in with those Byron Bay anti-Vaxx lot, people you would have despised in the past, makes for pretty strange bedfellows. But given Trump's anti-vaxx stance I suppose it is understandable.

SR, these are not vaccines in the traditional sense. They are entirely different to vaccines as we know them.

I thought you were knowledgeable enough to realise that, but apparently not.