You are the expert when it comes to talking gibberish and rubbish, Alan. Consensus is not science, and the 97% is a lie, cobbled together from many climate-tricksters - most not scientists anyway - to look as if it came from one organisation. Do more reading. Do less gibbering.

I wonder just what Murray is an associate professor of. It certainly can't be any subject with math involved, or he would know that CO2 can't do more than 10% of the balderdash it is supposed to do by those idiots wanting to do away with fossil fuel. The warmists have to continually invent mythical tipping points to try to prove the impossible. Why do some people burst into print to project their ignorance to all?

Then we have Alan off on another of his fantasies. I don't know where he gets the idea that it is pro fossil fuel people who are against nuclear power. Out here in the real world it is the greenies who are against nuclear Alan, not the petrol heads.

In fact many petrol heads do realise that petroleum is really too valuable to burn on that Sunday drive. Most of us would be completely happy to have a new motive power developed to drive our transport, but we are practical enough to know battery powered cars are not the answer.

With out oil derived products our modern world can not exist. Neither our health care system, or the every day products we need can be produced with out oil based chemicals.

I do get tired of trying to talk to the useful idiots in this world.

Hasbeen,
Hear, hear !

Meanwhile our fearless idiot leader rabbits on about how carbon capture and storage and technology will save the day. I suspect that day has already passed.
David

Carbon Capture and Storage is an oxymoron.

Dear Hasbeen,

How's it going old cock? Good?

You know it is really good to have you commenting of this topic, it shows just how left behind some people are.

Mate, there are so few singing off that song sheet that you really look like an old fool. How about you accept what 95% of the people do, that climate change is real and it needs dealing with.

As to CO2 I will again ask what property of it do you want me to dismiss to allow for our take on rising temperatures?