I like it when people get straight to the point!. However, I don't see that alphabet sexuality is a "covert destabilisation of mainstream sexuality". The 90 or whatever percent of heterosexuals do not have to pay any attention to it; the legalisation of same sex marriage doesn't give homosexuals, gender-benders and so forth any particular privileges (even though some of them seem to think it does); and, finally, a moronic 60% of Australians gave the go-ahead to the recognition of perversion.

Good on you, Greg Bondar; it's good to see that you are still allowed to speak your mind. I don't think many Australians will take much notice, simply because the majority either voted for Sodom & Gomorrah or were just too disinterested to defend decency and normality.

Australia is rooted.

I think your missing a critical point here son (ttbn).
The mob of screeching queers called gays and their gay rights, have pushed their agenda way past the goal posts and have entered the crowd.

Keep in mind their queer agenda is now legislated to cause those ninety percent of heterosexuals you noted, to join their club or be prosecuted.

Do you think that’s acceptable? I’m very sure I don’t!

Dan

Australian "family" voice!

Whose and which families one may very well ask?

Strange how no one in my wide circle of friends and acquaintances has any sympathy with any of the back-to-the-past propositions promoted by "holier-than-thou" right right religionists who wish to impose their "morality" onto every one else.

It is also interesting to note that many right-wing "religionists" both here and in America were supportive of The Donald, even promoting the ridiculous proposition that he (The Donald) was "god's" agent to re-christianize America.

One such benighted American loon was Eric Metaxas who was/is quite popular with right-wing Australian religionists.

An extremely vocal minority shares the Author's completely erroneous view!

And proven by the SS marriage LANDSLIDE referendum!

An unshakable belief in a flat world never ever made it flat!

Moreover, renowned geneticist Alan Saunders and his team discovered two gay genes and three more probables! In peer-reviewed science!

The fact that a tiny minority of gay-bashing homophobes, don't believe in the science! Doesn't change the established science!

Given we are all the creation of a divine God! It therefore follows, that God created the gay gene. And your sexual bias, decided in the womb, before you were born!

One does not see many folk with different coloured eyes! And given that is not the norm! The oink, oink brigade could claim that that indicated the mark of the devil or some such?

And would if that were written in some ancient if unproven ever, ancient scipt, that in truth, was the private if entirely erroneous views of the misguided writer!

I ask you, how much of "the book" is the private views of the scribbler!? And how much is proven, divinely inspired script!? Well? And given unproven belief!? Who's the sinner? The normal aberration? Or the stone age, gay-bashing minority that persecutes them from the cradle to the grave, regardless of very credible proof, they are WRONG, WRONG, WRONG!
Alan B.

I’m personally in favour of gouging out eyes as punishment.

“There are none so blind as those who will not see”.

Welcome to step two:

There are none so blind as those who cannot see (ever).

There is a historical context to this punishment, used often by early Christian Crusaders against there enemy captured.

Sadly though, Capitalism won out in the end, since blind captives were of little value to be sold into the slave markets.

But it was a good idea.

Dan

There seems to be so much hatred in the world.
Do we really need to add to it? We have attacks
on Muslims, attacks on children, attacks on women,
attacks on our Indigenous people, and the list goes
on. Do we need to have more attacks on a person's
sexual orientation? Don't we have enough on our plates
just coping with everyday life? And why are we better
than anybody else? Why do any of us have to obey
what's written in old books - written by many people
in a time long ago - books full of ideas - but books
are not human. They are not living breathing human
beings. And written so long ago should be taken in
their context of that time. Surely not in the 21st
century?

The author needs to get off his high horse and take
his soap box and preach elsewhere. Families made
between a man and a woman are not perfect as we all
know for a variety of reasons. And finger-pointing
at anyone is not a good look. Give it a rest.

Not being comfortable with homosexuality or gender reassigning isn't 'attacking' anyone - nothing like the attacks on white, heterosexual males by people only too happy to dramatise and inflate people's right to oppose homosexuality and same sex marriage. My wife has two homosexual friends who I occasionally meet and chat with. I don't attack them, and they don't have any idea what I think about their sexual preference and they never will, unless they ask me. The two friends have been together for years, but scoff at thd idea of 'marriage', when people more insensitive than I ask them about it. I would no more discuss what my wife's friends do in private than I would quiz heterosexual people about what the get up to. But, I remain implacably opposed to homosexuality and same sex marriage.

Interestingly the further you get away from the inner city ghetto's of the woke brigade, the less of this rubbish you get. This does tend to indicate it is a disease induced by the total divorce from nature of these people.

Real country kids still know where the lambs, calves & horses come from, & most know the process that make them. Even town & city kids used to know where puppies & kittens came from, but how many do today. Just as so many think milk comes in a bottle, with all the pets desexed, many now think pets come from the pet shop.

The further up the high rise the further from reality. Is it any wonder they are easy targets for the ratbags of this world, pushing their rubbish for what ever reason their polluted brains can imagine.

The "inconvenient truth" about so-called alphabet people is that they are a real thing, consistently and neurotically hated by all three Abrahamic religions.

Sure, one can roll one's eyes at "chest feeding". But organised Christianity is vastly powerful and richly cosseted in this country, not the oppressed victim.

For any wavering person who might be "seduced" by activists into declaring their alphabet status, and who even really cares, I could show you millions of vulnerable kids being taught the weirdness that "Jesus died on a cross for their sins".

Thanks for the article Greg Bondar I found your views to be fairly in agreement with my own. The point you've made is critical that the alphabet people are using social engineering techniques to manipulate society in the normalisation of alphabet culture. The end goal is to breakdown and disempower western society and the underpinning structures such as the church and to make the world communist. I liked the reference to Charles Swindoll.