I like it when people get straight to the point!. However, I don't see that alphabet sexuality is a "covert destabilisation of mainstream sexuality". The 90 or whatever percent of heterosexuals do not have to pay any attention to it; the legalisation of same sex marriage doesn't give homosexuals, gender-benders and so forth any particular privileges (even though some of them seem to think it does); and, finally, a moronic 60% of Australians gave the go-ahead to the recognition of perversion.

Good on you, Greg Bondar; it's good to see that you are still allowed to speak your mind. I don't think many Australians will take much notice, simply because the majority either voted for Sodom & Gomorrah or were just too disinterested to defend decency and normality.

Australia is rooted.

I think your missing a critical point here son (ttbn).
The mob of screeching queers called gays and their gay rights, have pushed their agenda way past the goal posts and have entered the crowd.

Keep in mind their queer agenda is now legislated to cause those ninety percent of heterosexuals you noted, to join their club or be prosecuted.

Do you think that’s acceptable? I’m very sure I don’t!

Dan

Australian "family" voice!

Whose and which families one may very well ask?

Strange how no one in my wide circle of friends and acquaintances has any sympathy with any of the back-to-the-past propositions promoted by "holier-than-thou" right right religionists who wish to impose their "morality" onto every one else.

It is also interesting to note that many right-wing "religionists" both here and in America were supportive of The Donald, even promoting the ridiculous proposition that he (The Donald) was "god's" agent to re-christianize America.

One such benighted American loon was Eric Metaxas who was/is quite popular with right-wing Australian religionists.

An extremely vocal minority shares the Author's completely erroneous view!

And proven by the SS marriage LANDSLIDE referendum!

An unshakable belief in a flat world never ever made it flat!

Moreover, renowned geneticist Alan Saunders and his team discovered two gay genes and three more probables! In peer-reviewed science!

The fact that a tiny minority of gay-bashing homophobes, don't believe in the science! Doesn't change the established science!

Given we are all the creation of a divine God! It therefore follows, that God created the gay gene. And your sexual bias, decided in the womb, before you were born!

One does not see many folk with different coloured eyes! And given that is not the norm! The oink, oink brigade could claim that that indicated the mark of the devil or some such?

And would if that were written in some ancient if unproven ever, ancient scipt, that in truth, was the private if entirely erroneous views of the misguided writer!

I ask you, how much of "the book" is the private views of the scribbler!? And how much is proven, divinely inspired script!? Well? And given unproven belief!? Who's the sinner? The normal aberration? Or the stone age, gay-bashing minority that persecutes them from the cradle to the grave, regardless of very credible proof, they are WRONG, WRONG, WRONG!
Alan B.

I’m personally in favour of gouging out eyes as punishment.

“There are none so blind as those who will not see”.

Welcome to step two:

There are none so blind as those who cannot see (ever).

There is a historical context to this punishment, used often by early Christian Crusaders against there enemy captured.

Sadly though, Capitalism won out in the end, since blind captives were of little value to be sold into the slave markets.

But it was a good idea.

Dan

There seems to be so much hatred in the world.
Do we really need to add to it? We have attacks
on Muslims, attacks on children, attacks on women,
attacks on our Indigenous people, and the list goes
on. Do we need to have more attacks on a person's
sexual orientation? Don't we have enough on our plates
just coping with everyday life? And why are we better
than anybody else? Why do any of us have to obey
what's written in old books - written by many people
in a time long ago - books full of ideas - but books
are not human. They are not living breathing human
beings. And written so long ago should be taken in
their context of that time. Surely not in the 21st
century?

The author needs to get off his high horse and take
his soap box and preach elsewhere. Families made
between a man and a woman are not perfect as we all
know for a variety of reasons. And finger-pointing
at anyone is not a good look. Give it a rest.