The Forum > Article Comments > The troubling case of Professor Ridd > Comments
The troubling case of Professor Ridd : Comments
By Adrienne Stone and Joshua Forrest, published 24/6/2021Does the principle of academic freedom protect Australian academics who engage in pointed public criticism of their academic colleagues, and university governance?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
-
- All
Of course, history has shown that some scientists were willing to do just that. James Van Allen was ostracised by the entire scientific community when he theorised that the Earth was surrounded by belts of radiation. The abuse and personal attacks became so severe that he refused to even discuss the mater, even with his friends. To any enquiry he would simply say "We'll see". And he was right.
The idea that scientists are impartial protectors of humanity, and not just people obsessed with public funded research grants, took a real hit lately. The USA's own head of the Health Department, Dr Fauci, tried to hide the fact that it was his public research funds which paid for the research on the Chinese virus now killing millions around the world.
Everything that happened to Ridd was reflected in the Chinese virus cover up. The leading scientist lied, and he was supported by his scientific mates, who are as addicted to public research grants as meth heads to their methamphetamine. One respected virologist from a leading Californian university wrote Fauci an email saying that the Chinese virus looked engineered. But he subsequently retracted his letter. One suspects that he, like Ridd, was pressured by his peers to shut up. The boss of the US Centre for Disease Control was sent death threats about his conviction that the virus was engineered. Not from nutters, but from fellow virologists.
Because this virus has the potential to do to virus research what Chernobyl did for nuclear research. And what Ridd did, was threatening to caste an unwelcome light upon the validity of climate research.
Foxy thinks that just sticking up for what her peer group of academics say displays her intelligence and moral fibre. Actually, it is those with the courage to speak the truth who are the real academics and scientists.