The Forum > Article Comments > Matters of communication: Handelsblatting the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine > Comments
Matters of communication: Handelsblatting the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine : Comments
By Binoy Kampmark, published 17/3/2021The introduction of a new vaccine with 'reports of adverse events such as this' was far from 'unusual'. On the contrary, it showed 'that adverse reaction monitoring systems are working'.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
The puppeteers seem determined to keep us in a state of panic: when things start to look up, they dream up another scare: OMG! Three people among all those vaccinated experienced blood clots. As the fear and horror - and the control - fades, they are losing their god-like status, and have to come up with even more ways to scare the crap out of us.
Posted by ttbn, Wednesday, 17 March 2021 9:28:48 AM
| |
What's the actual point of this vaccine?
It won't stop you getting COVID, and it won't stop you giving it to others. So technically it achieves little to nothing, right? Elderly people are the only ones who are likely to die from COVID. But whats the point of this vaccine if they're the exact ones put at risk by taking it? Why do we need this crap for when there's no community transmission? Just ignore the HUMUNGOUS elephant in the room. What was the point of billions upon billions in debt preventing and eradicating transmission on our shores if they then kill us or make us sick with an unsafe and untested vaccine? And for what good - to open the borders so more foreigners with more strains of COVID can come? I'm sorry but the benefits do not outweigh the risks, and the medical people can approve whatever the hell they want; - But that doesn't mean I will approve it's use in MY BODY - The only transmission we have is from returned travelers, hotel quarantine, and doctors and hospitals that deal with those people. "The medical wisdom on this remains consistent: certain adverse events will happen; comorbidities can play a distracting role. To quote Dr Peter English, till recently Chair of the BMA Public Health Medicine Committee, the introduction of a new vaccine with "reports of adverse events such as this" was far from "unusual". On the contrary, it showed "that adverse reaction monitoring systems are working" rather than indicating a causal link between the reaction and the vaccination." Why would they want to put us at risk of EXPECTED side effects, when we don't even have community transmission except for returned travelers? The truth is THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT OUR HEALTH AT ALL. Why have autism and cancer increased ever since scientists started extracting viruses from animals and injecting them into humans? Why do these things correlate with when they first started injecting people with vaccinations? Ep 74.A: Power to redesign every species! Lederberg / Southam / Breeze / HIV / Fauci / Virotherapy http://youtu.be/Km556-1_Ky4 Posted by Armchair Critic, Saturday, 20 March 2021 2:47:20 PM
|
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All