I can't wait until the movie comes out!

But while we are waiting for the movie we can always watch this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBe_guezGGc

And this year's Academy Award nominee is ..................

In all of this imbroglio, there is one thing missing- a standard of propriety. Porter and Morrison lack it. It's as simple as that. An honorable person would have resigned [Porter rejected it out of hand];Morrison for his political reasons, denied the correct course of an inquiry. Both are dishonorable men.

The woman who accused Porter is not given the opportunity for her case to be heard in public. Is that justice?

It is totally unreasonable to expect anybody, even a politician, to resign over an anonymous complaint that cannot be proved or disproved; a complaint that was withdrawn 30 plus years ago, at a time when Porter was a 17 year old boy nobody had heard of. Now that he is a high ranking politician, though, any excuse at all is reason for political ideologs to bay for his blood - even to have a go at the Prime Minister for doing his job to protect the integrity of the law against the mob.

And these critics have the gall to mention 'honour' and 'propriety' with the same breath they hurl their bile. How Australian society has fallen.

Stop Press !
A male friend of the lady was on TV last night, she apparently met
Porter some many years after the Debating Contest and had dinner with him as told to this friend.
It appears the ABC has had this for some time.

The police have reviewed the information and declared that there is no official complaint or evidence to take this to trial. The case is effectively closed.

The complainant who was certified psychotic is dead, the document she left behind was drafted when she was suffering from psychosis and is unsigned, there is no lodged complaint, no witnesses, no physical evidence, and no one that was informed of the supposed rape within decades of it supposedly happening.

The case is not only closed but non-existent. There is absolutely nothing an independent inquiry can work with, and the result is a foregone conclusion.

This is a pure lynching.

A lynching it is. An independent inquiry won't exonerate Porter, only find for or against him on the 'balance of probabilities'. Any smear is sufficient, it's totally political, and given the zeitgeist Porter will depart for the good of the Government.