Bazz said- "Relax Canem, it made no sense at all !"

Answer- No problems Bazz- let me know which words you don't understand. ;)
I'm sure you're familiar with "Communist hysterical militancy" probably being on the receiving end of it- as am I.

Prof Deneen- University of Notre Dame- wrote a book called "Why Liberalism Failed"

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/announcing-the-death-of-classical-liberalism/

http://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300223446/why-liberalism-failed#book-reviews

http://thefederalist.com/2018/01/12/understand-liberalism-failing-right-left-read-patrick-deneens-latest/

http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/latenightlive/the-death-of-liberalism/9380788

The man made greenhouse gas phenomenon that is producing adverse climate change is TOO BIG TO FIX.

As American philosopher Roy Scranton has noted: humankind just has to learn how to die in the Anthropocene.

Canem,

the only reference I made to Cuomo was in response to your comment:

'To me there are too many people on the Earth-...'

I said 'Cuomo agrees'.

I thought the link to nursing home murders during the china virus obvious.

It was irony.

Your, in an odd response to a little quip, leapt onto your soapbox, in typical idealogue fashion, to explain. Your opinion on Communism etc is sadly full of misguided assumptions.

Have you. ever read the Communists Marx and Hittler?

mr Opinion,

latest research suggests we will survive the reverse polarity ... which is starting to be recognised as the cause of the Climate change ... ahhhh both the cooling and warming extremes.

Really why is it so hard to acknowledge the advance in science and knowledge. Much is being written at the moment, It's just that the climate changer alarmists are ignoring this field of science. The Main Stream Media, and their listeners, are too dumbed down to understand.

Intellectuals entertain the divergent theories and understand over time then truth will emerge to replace the simplistic beliefs and cant, in this case, of idealogue climate change alarmists.

This topic has been studied and talked about since the 1960's.
For Christ sake at least acknowledge knowledge and understanding changes and grows over a 60 year period ... in modern times it has been exponential.

So why is this not evidenced in the thinking of climate warming alarmisms? Their belief and cant hasn't change one iota in 60 years

SR,

" so it seems you are speaking for yourself.."

I always speak for myself. As I explained in a post in another thread, I don't base my opinions on what this group or that group thinks. Clearly that concept has gone over your head. I know that you desperately want to in the safety of the herd, but I'd prefer to be right than safe.

imajulianutter,

You are what I like to call a 'Quinella-ist'.