Dear Pete S,

Mate you really are making this up as you go.

"I believe that a reliance on ‘the science’ will vindicate my understanding of the uselessness of trying to use CO2 as a knob to set global temperatures to a level we would prefer."

A reliance on the science is doing the exact opposite.

I have asked this a few times of people like you. What physical property of CO2 would you like me to ignore so that I can disregard the increase in temperature that must physically result in higher concentrations?

Test

Tks Graham,
Pete S, Here are some links.

http://tinyurl.com/y3hh3qpa5

http://calderup.wordpress.com/category/3-climate-change/

That last one will lead you to Henrik Svenmark who seems to be he
who started it all by tying cosmic rays to cloud formation.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-11/scientists-finland-japan-man-made-climate-change-doesnt-exist-practice

Google or rather duckduckgo Jyrki Kauppinen
There is a lot of entries for him.
I have lost the names of the Japanese Kobe Uni scientists but it
should be possible to find them.

Being not the conventional belief I have just among friends and
club members you can expect adverse comments on your sanity for not
just accepting what you are told. My mad Greenie daughter in law
is a typical example.
Cheers